Created attachment 498709 [details] net-snmp respond to the SNMPv2C GetRequest with error community type Description of problem: net-snmp respond to the SNMPv2C GetRequest and GetNextRequest with error community type field or RequestID type or RequestID Value or Error-status type or Error-index type. The details can be seen in http://focus.bne.redhat.com/~xhu/SNMP-MIP/Conform/RHEL5u7-alpha/ct-snmpv2c-ag-1.1.0-RHEL5.7alpha-20110513/AG/index.html. You can check the test log and tcmpdumpfile for the "WARN" test: 19 Get with Community Type Error 26 Get with RequestID Type Error 30 Get with Error-status Type Error 33 Get with Error-index Type Error 62 GetNext with Community Type Error 68 GetNext with RequestID Type Error 72 GetNext with Error-status Type Error 75 GetNext with Error-index Type Error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-2.6.18-259.el5 net-snmp-utils-5.3.2.2-12.el5 net-snmp-5.3.2.2-12.el5 net-snmp-libs-5.3.2.2-12.el5 How reproducible: everytimes Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: net-snmp respond to the SNMPv2C GetRequest and GetNextRequest with error community type field or RequestID type or RequestID Value or Error-status type or Error-index type. Expected results: net-snmp should not respond to the SNMPv2C GetRequest and GetNextRequest with error community type field or RequestID type or RequestID Value or Error-status type or Error-index type. Additional info:
Hi Karel, I have re-test it with net-snmp-5.3.2.2-13.el5 and it passed. The test result can be seen in http://focus.bne.redhat.com/~xhu/SNMP-MIP/Conform/RHEL5u7-alpha/ct-snmpv2c-ag-1.1.0-RHEL5.7alpha-20110513/AG/index.html
Hi Karel, The link is the same but the content is updated to the latest.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1076.html