Bug 705517 - Add package rubygem-oauth-active-resource to RHEL
Summary: Add package rubygem-oauth-active-resource to RHEL
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Subscription Asset Manager
Classification: Retired
Component: katello
Version: 1.0.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Bryan Kearney
QA Contact: SAM QE List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 738162
Blocks: katello-blockers
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-17 19:54 UTC by Mike Khusid
Modified: 2013-04-02 23:45 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-14 19:06:49 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mike Khusid 2011-05-17 19:54:26 UTC 
rubygem-oauth-active-resource is required to implement Subscription Asset Manager (SAM) functionality.
Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2011-10-14 15:20:18 UTC 
Added as part of the katello packaging effort
Comment 3 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-25 14:46:53 UTC 
Hi guys,

I am wondering how are you using this gem with Rails 3, if it is designed for Rails 2, there are apparently some issue [1] with Rails 3 and upstream is not very responsive it seems.

[1] See https://github.com/jwagener/oauth-active-resource/pull/1
Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2012-01-26 17:41:28 UTC 
Bryan,

Could you please enlighten me how are going to use this semi-functional, non-maintained package? I don't think this is a good idea.
Comment 5 Mike McCune 2012-01-26 19:08:41 UTC 
mass ON_QA move
Comment 7 Og Maciel 2012-02-15 16:50:05 UTC 
<OgMaciel> jlaska, got a question on 705517 and 705519. If I install katello-all and get those packages, then I can close those issues, right?
* jlaska looks
<jlaska> OgMaciel: yeah, if the packages were included using a brew repo, or an official puddle, those can move to VERIFIED
Comment 8 James Laska 2012-02-15 19:45:05 UTC 
The latest candidate Beta puddle for System Engine includes rubygem-oauth (http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/latest/el6-se/x86_64/rubygem-oauth-0.4.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm), but I see no mention of rubygem-oauth-active-resource
Comment 9 Og Maciel 2012-02-15 19:57:58 UTC 
Just wanted to clarify this. The summary of this issue states that this package should go into RHEL but right now they are included with SE. What is the expected solution?
Comment 10 Og Maciel 2012-02-15 20:13:22 UTC 
Pending what James asked, can I assume this is for SE only for now (as BZ 705519)?
Comment 11 Og Maciel 2012-02-17 18:36:10 UTC 
Mike, ping?
Comment 12 Mike Khusid 2012-03-09 18:07:28 UTC 
For bugs that are listed under CloudForms today, please ignore "to RHEL" part of the title. That wording was written nearly a year ago when we didn't have CloudForms product in bugzilla, nor a plan for SE/SAM packaging.
Comment 13 Og Maciel 2012-03-09 19:05:30 UTC 
Mike, thank you for clarifying that. Now, your issue mentions rubygem-oauth-active-resource but there is a rubygem-oauth-0.4.4-1.el6.noarch instead. Is this what I should be looking for instead? Is it safe to close this issue?
Comment 14 Jeff Weiss 2012-03-14 17:02:31 UTC 
This package is not even used by System Engine, moving to SAM product.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.