Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 705517

Summary: Add package rubygem-oauth-active-resource to RHEL
Product: [Retired] Subscription Asset Manager Reporter: Mike Khusid <mkhusid>
Component: katelloAssignee: Bryan Kearney <bkearney>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: SAM QE List <sam-qe-list>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 1.0.0CC: bkearney, jlaska, jofernan, jskrabal, notting, omaciel, vondruch
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-14 19:06:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 738162    
Bug Blocks: 747354    

Description Mike Khusid 2011-05-17 19:54:26 UTC
rubygem-oauth-active-resource is required to implement Subscription Asset Manager (SAM) functionality.

Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2011-10-14 15:20:18 UTC
Added as part of the katello packaging effort

Comment 3 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-25 14:46:53 UTC
Hi guys,

I am wondering how are you using this gem with Rails 3, if it is designed for Rails 2, there are apparently some issue [1] with Rails 3 and upstream is not very responsive it seems.

[1] See https://github.com/jwagener/oauth-active-resource/pull/1

Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2012-01-26 17:41:28 UTC
Bryan,

Could you please enlighten me how are going to use this semi-functional, non-maintained package? I don't think this is a good idea.

Comment 5 Mike McCune 2012-01-26 19:08:41 UTC
mass ON_QA move

Comment 7 Og Maciel 2012-02-15 16:50:05 UTC
<OgMaciel> jlaska, got a question on 705517 and 705519. If I install katello-all and get those packages, then I can close those issues, right?
* jlaska looks
<jlaska> OgMaciel: yeah, if the packages were included using a brew repo, or an official puddle, those can move to VERIFIED

Comment 8 James Laska 2012-02-15 19:45:05 UTC
The latest candidate Beta puddle for System Engine includes rubygem-oauth (http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/latest/el6-se/x86_64/rubygem-oauth-0.4.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm), but I see no mention of rubygem-oauth-active-resource

Comment 9 Og Maciel 2012-02-15 19:57:58 UTC
Just wanted to clarify this. The summary of this issue states that this package should go into RHEL but right now they are included with SE. What is the expected solution?

Comment 10 Og Maciel 2012-02-15 20:13:22 UTC
Pending what James asked, can I assume this is for SE only for now (as BZ 705519)?

Comment 11 Og Maciel 2012-02-17 18:36:10 UTC
Mike, ping?

Comment 12 Mike Khusid 2012-03-09 18:07:28 UTC
For bugs that are listed under CloudForms today, please ignore "to RHEL" part of the title. That wording was written nearly a year ago when we didn't have CloudForms product in bugzilla, nor a plan for SE/SAM packaging.

Comment 13 Og Maciel 2012-03-09 19:05:30 UTC
Mike, thank you for clarifying that. Now, your issue mentions rubygem-oauth-active-resource but there is a rubygem-oauth-0.4.4-1.el6.noarch instead. Is this what I should be looking for instead? Is it safe to close this issue?

Comment 14 Jeff Weiss 2012-03-14 17:02:31 UTC
This package is not even used by System Engine, moving to SAM product.