Bug 7075 - iBCS segmentation violation SCO binary
Summary: iBCS segmentation violation SCO binary
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 6951
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6.1
Hardware: i386 Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael K. Johnson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-11-17 13:35 UTC by Brent R Brian
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-02-06 05:41:35 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Brent R Brian 1999-11-17 13:35:55 UTC
SCO 3.2.4.2 static binary, Business Basic, Basis Intl.

Runs fine under emulation RH 5.2, and runs on RH 6.1
(if installed as an upgraded from 5.2).

Failure occurs under a FRESH INSTALL of RH 6.1 with a

	"segmentation violation"

I have installed kernel-ibcs and re-'make'd the file, but
I get compile errors until x286 is turned off.  After a
successful compile I get the same thing.

Comment 1 Brent R Brian 1999-11-30 13:42:59 UTC
I did a fresh install of 5.2, iBCS worked well.
Rebuilt the kernel (pentium on, math emul off), still worked.
I upgraded 5.2 -> 6.1, iBCS still worked well.
I did a fresh install of 6.1, iBCS gives segmentation violation.
I RPM'd the kernel-ibcs source, followed the 'make' instructions,
  it still did not work.
Rebuilt the kernel, (pentium on, math emul off), still did not work.
I have compared the MAKEDEV.ibcs, they are the same.

Can I check anything else to help things along ??

B

Comment 2 Brent R Brian 1999-12-15 15:39:59 UTC
I found the following error during the compile of iBCS

binfmt_elf.c >> line 502: <<

	retval=namei(elf_interpreter,&interpreter_inode);

too many arguments.  The rest of the code uses a single
argument (filename).

Comment 3 Cristian Gafton 2000-01-04 22:20:59 UTC
Assigned to dledford

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2000-02-06 05:41:59 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6951 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.