Hide Forgot
Take a look at bug 708460 The summary says TAINTED, but the backtrace shows clearly that it's 'Not tainted'
ABRT takes the tainted flag from /proc/sys/kernel/tainted and tainted flag is set to 512, which is "Warning Issued". Why the kernel set tainted value, when backtrace says that kernel is not tainted? Should we skip that flag? And if yes, are there any more flags to ignore?
The problem is that reading that file after an oops is ALWAYS going to show it as tainted. Either parse the text from the oops, or don't do it at all.
fix has landed the git
abrt-2.0.4.981-3.fc16,libreport-2.0.6-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.4.981-3.fc16,libreport-2.0.6-2.fc16
abrt-2.0.3-5.fc15,libreport-2.0.4-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.3-5.fc15,libreport-2.0.4-4.fc15
Package abrt-2.0.3-5.fc15, libreport-2.0.4-4.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing abrt-2.0.3-5.fc15 libreport-2.0.4-4.fc15' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14015 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
abrt-2.0.4.981-3.fc16, libreport-2.0.6-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
abrt-2.0.3-5.fc15, libreport-2.0.4-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.