Bug 708880 - [abrt] kernel: [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
Summary: [abrt] kernel: [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 787319
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 15
Hardware: i686
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:27d8cde8ed8812ff85327b08b7b...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-30 01:14 UTC by STEVEN WARD
Modified: 2012-02-27 18:22 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-27 18:22:39 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description STEVEN WARD 2011-05-30 01:14:13 UTC
abrt version: 2.0.1
architecture:   i686
cmdline:        ro root=UUID=e0f4a185-f9ad-4031-a815-801a56ff0440 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYTABLE=uk rhgb quiet
component:      kernel
kernel:         2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.debug
os_release:     Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
package:        kernel
reason:         [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
reported_to:    kerneloops: URL=http://submit.kerneloops.org/submitoops.php
time:           Mon May 30 02:10:26 2011

backtrace:
:[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
:2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.debug #1
:---------------------------------------------
:pulseaudio/1267 is trying to acquire lock:
: (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<f841c662>] snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
:but task is already holding lock:
: (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<f841c662>] snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
:other info that might help us debug this:
:4 locks held by pulseaudio/1267:
: #0:  (snd_pcm_link_rwlock){......}, at: [<f841c004>] snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq+0x15/0x23 [snd_pcm]
: #1:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<f841c00f>] snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq+0x20/0x23 [snd_pcm]
: #2:  (&(&substream->group->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<f841d467>] snd_pcm_action+0x2a/0x7e [snd_pcm]
: #3:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<f841c662>] snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
:stack backtrace:
:Pid: 1267, comm: pulseaudio Not tainted 2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.debug #1
:Call Trace:
: [<c0809306>] ? printk+0x2d/0x2f
: [<c0467343>] __lock_acquire+0x7b4/0xb0d
: [<f841c662>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
: [<c0467aba>] lock_acquire+0xbc/0xdc
: [<f841c662>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
: [<c08116c5>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x39/0x66
: [<f841c662>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
: [<f841c662>] snd_pcm_action_group+0x4a/0x1d3 [snd_pcm]
: [<f841d49a>] snd_pcm_action+0x5d/0x7e [snd_pcm]
: [<f841d4d1>] snd_pcm_stop+0x16/0x18 [snd_pcm]
: [<f841d55f>] snd_pcm_drop+0x8c/0x9c [snd_pcm]
: [<c045a937>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x134/0x144
: [<f841e993>] snd_pcm_common_ioctl1+0xc08/0xca4 [snd_pcm]
: [<c045a937>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x134/0x144
: [<c04084e4>] ? native_sched_clock+0x41/0x94
: [<c040853f>] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
: [<c045a624>] ? sched_clock_local+0x10/0x18b
: [<f841f100>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+0x348/0x354 [snd_pcm]
: [<c05aec5c>] ? file_has_perm+0x9d/0xb6
: [<f841f13b>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl+0x2f/0x35 [snd_pcm]
: [<f841f10c>] ? snd_pcm_playback_ioctl+0x0/0x35 [snd_pcm]
: [<c0502721>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x46b/0x49c
: [<c05aee1a>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x39/0x3c
: [<c050279a>] sys_ioctl+0x48/0x6a
: [<c081228c>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

comment:
:I started in init 3 in my kernel parameters. I ran startx but I got a blank screen! the xserver was complaining with the mesage:
:
:waiting for X server to begin accepting connections: No protocol specified

event_log:
:2011-05-30-02:14:06> Submitting oops report to http://submit.kerneloops.org/submitoops.php
:2011-05-30-02:14:07  Kernel oops report was uploaded

Comment 1 Josh Boyer 2011-10-11 17:23:52 UTC
Have you seen this with the kernel-debug-2.6.40.6-0.fc15 update at all?

Comment 2 Josh Boyer 2012-02-27 18:22:39 UTC
Answering my own question.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 787319 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.