Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 709726

Summary: New Bugzilla component for Fedora Resource Management Guide
Product: [Retired] Fedora Documentation Reporter: Martin Prpič <mprpic>
Component: docs-requestsAssignee: Nick Bebout <nb>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Documentation Project <docs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: develCC: eric, kwade, nb, stickster, zach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-14 00:31:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Martin Prpič 2011-06-01 14:03:08 UTC 
Requesting a new Bugzilla component: resource-management-guide

Thanks,
Martin
Comment 1 Nick Bebout 2011-06-01 23:38:35 UTC 
Not sure if this is allowed anymore, Fedora is trying to move everything to trac on fedorahosted, but I'll see, since all the other docs are on bugzilla.
Comment 2 Nick Bebout 2011-06-02 02:18:11 UTC 
UGH, I was thinking of the wrong thing.  Fedora Documentation components can certainly be created.

I assume mprpic should be default assignee, who should be listed as QA contact?
Comment 3 Martin Prpič 2011-06-02 06:59:44 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> UGH, I was thinking of the wrong thing.  Fedora Documentation components can
> certainly be created.
> 
> I assume mprpic should be default assignee, who should be listed as QA contact?

I guess nobody for now :( If anyone signs up to be QE for this guide, I'll let you know and you can update it.

And yes, put me as the default assignee.

Thanks!