abrt version: 1.1.18
Attached file: backtrace, 6640 bytes
cmdline: cdda2wav -B -Owav dev=/dev/sr0
Attached file: coredump, 1331200 bytes
reason: Process /usr/bin/icedax was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
How to reproduce
1. i dont know any more
Created attachment 502392 [details]
How to reproduce
1. run icedax -D /dev/cdrom in terminal 1
2. run icedax -D /dev/cdrom in terminal 2, it will wait to terminal 1 is ready
3. press ctrl-c in terminal 1
cdrkit-1.1.11-8.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
cdrkit-1.1.11-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing cdrkit-1.1.11-3.fc14'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
then log in and leave karma (feedback).
The problems you see here are from the fact that you are using an
unmaintained piece of sofware that is 6 years behind the current
software. The bug-fix you copied from the original software has been
introduced in the original software 2 years ago already....
Another important problem with cdrkit is it's dubious legality.
The original code however is doubtlessly legal and actively maintained.
I still don't understand why RedHat prefers to distribute code with stil more than 100 well documented bugs and that only offers 50% of the features of the original software.
Why does RedHat spend time to support anti-OSS activities from Debian?
cdrkit-1.1.11-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
cdrkit-1.1.11-8.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Is there any reason why RedHat advertizes unmaintained software of
questionable legality that only exists because of an attack against
the legal and well maintained original software?
Jörg, I don't think it is necessary to begin the same conversation (or monologue?) in every cdrkit bug. Many similar ideas were already said in bug #507108.
As long as RedHat distributes the illegal cdrkit instead of the legal
original software and as long as RedHat legal denies even to talk about
this problem, what other opportunity do I have to enclourage you to
start a discussion that ends in RedHat becomming legal again?