Bug 710906 (oct-signal) - Review Request: octave-signal - Signal processing for Octave
Summary: Review Request: octave-signal - Signal processing for Octave
Alias: oct-signal
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Susi Lehtola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: oct-optim
Blocks: oct-communications
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2011-06-05 16:24 UTC by Thomas Sailer
Modified: 2011-09-10 00:27 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2011-09-09 17:06:20 UTC
Type: ---
susi.lehtola: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Thomas Sailer 2011-06-05 16:24:10 UTC
Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/octave-signal.spec
SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/octave-signal-1.0.11-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description: Signal processing tools, including filtering, windowing and display

Comment 1 José Matos 2011-06-13 15:24:07 UTC
I will take the review.

Comment 2 Susi Lehtola 2011-08-12 17:45:52 UTC
Ping José? Are you going to do the review or not?

Comment 3 Susi Lehtola 2011-08-16 07:04:58 UTC
Looks like José is MIA. Taking over review.

Comment 4 Susi Lehtola 2011-08-16 07:57:11 UTC
rpmlint output:
octave-signal.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %40unreal
octave-signal.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided octave-forge
octave-signal.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/octave/packages/signal-1.0.11/packinfo/.autoload
octave-signal.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/octave/packages/signal-1.0.11/packinfo/.autoload
octave-signal.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun cp
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.

These are OK.


Here you have the correct dependency to octave(api). Good.

I wouldn't mind a comment about Patch0, e.g. "Fix the address of FSF.", though.


You are missing the -v flag from mkoctfile in the Makefile to get the build commands to display. Fix this in the nostrip patch.


Change the summary to "Signal processing tools for Octave"

Why are you using 

%octave_cmd pkg build '-verbose' '-nodeps'
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{_arch} %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}

instead of

%octave_pkg_build ?


MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the  Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK
- Actual license is GPLv3+, not GPLv2+.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK
$ md5sum signal-1.0.11.tar.gz ../SOURCES/signal-1.0.11.tar.gz 
808a4b5d3c7953e1ac66ef870693cfa5  signal-1.0.11.tar.gz
808a4b5d3c7953e1ac66ef870693cfa5  ../SOURCES/signal-1.0.11.tar.gz

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A

MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK
- Add "-v" to mkoctfile command in Makefile to see flags.

MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned, architecture dependent dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

Comment 5 Thomas Sailer 2011-08-26 10:41:30 UTC
Thank you for taking the review!

I have addressed your points:

Comment 6 Susi Lehtola 2011-08-26 12:41:20 UTC
All issues have been fixed, so this package is


Same note as in bug #710905: be sure to build against octave-3.4.2-2.

Comment 7 Thomas Sailer 2011-08-26 14:05:47 UTC
Thank you!

New Package SCM Request
Package Name: octave-signal
Short Description: Signal processing tools for Octave
Owners: sailer
Branches: f15 f16

Comment 8 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-08-26 14:25:50 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2011-09-01 09:36:10 UTC
octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2011-09-01 12:05:38 UTC
octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2011-09-01 19:01:50 UTC
octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2011-09-09 17:06:15 UTC
octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2011-09-10 00:27:35 UTC
octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.