Bug 710990 - [abrt] kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 67s! [md0_raid5:697]
Summary: [abrt] kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 67s! [md0_raid5:697]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 710841
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 15
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:69350a441e64ed41be91a4f2bde...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-06 06:26 UTC by Trever Adams
Modified: 2011-07-19 12:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-19 12:47:02 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Trever Adams 2011-06-06 06:26:30 UTC
abrt version: 2.0.1
architecture:   x86_64
cmdline:        ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_forbiddencity-lv_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_forbiddencity/lv_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_forbiddencity/lv_swap rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYTABLE=us rhgb quiet
comment:        Another attempt at running amdump. I believe is running when this happens.
component:      kernel
kernel:         2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64
os_release:     Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
package:        kernel
reason:         BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 67s! [md0_raid5:697]
reported_to:    kerneloops: URL=http://submit.kerneloops.org/submitoops.php
time:           Mon Jun  6 00:23:58 2011

backtrace:
:BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 67s! [md0_raid5:697]
:Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand powernow_k8 freq_table mperf ts_kmp ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_amanda nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables raid456 async_raid6_recov async_pq snd_hda_codec_realtek raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec eeepc_wmi snd_hwdep snd_seq sparse_keymap rfkill snd_seq_device snd_pcm r8169 mii sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer snd wmi soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
:CPU 1 
:Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand powernow_k8 freq_table mperf ts_kmp ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_amanda nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables raid456 async_raid6_recov async_pq snd_hda_codec_realtek raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec eeepc_wmi snd_hwdep snd_seq sparse_keymap rfkill snd_seq_device snd_pcm r8169 mii sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer snd wmi soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
:Pid: 697, comm: md0_raid5 Not tainted 2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64 #1 System manufacturer System Product Name/E35M1-M PRO
:RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813daa0c>]  [<ffffffff813daa0c>] eth_type_trans+0x0/0x111
:RSP: 0018:ffff8800b7903d88  EFLAGS: 00000282
:RAX: ffff880124901040 RBX: ffffffff81475dd3 RCX: 00000000000005ea
:RDX: 000000000000062a RSI: ffff8801237c2000 RDI: ffff88011a7e6600
:RBP: ffff8800b7903e00 R08: ffff880124901000 R09: ffff8800b7b89000
:R10: ffffffff81b40d00 R11: ffffffff81b40d00 R12: ffffffff8100a593
:R13: ffff8800b7903cf8 R14: ffff8801237c26c0 R15: ffff8801237c2000
:FS:  00007f74f4c9d7e0(0000) GS:ffff8800b7900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
:CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
:CR2: 000000000064a000 CR3: 0000000125b48000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
:DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
:DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
:Process md0_raid5 (pid: 697, threadinfo ffff88011b49a000, task ffff88012358ae40)
:Stack:
: ffffffffa01d7ae2 ffffffff8147bec6 ffff8801237c26d8 00000000b4284000
: 000005ea00000001 ffff880127eee090 ffff88011b6b8000 00000000000005ea
: 0090e5810000002a 00000001028311c3 ffff8801237c26d8 ffff8801237c2000
:Call Trace:

Comment 1 Trever Adams 2011-07-05 19:44:41 UTC
I switched Realtek 8169 to Intel e100e PCIe card. I have not been able to duplicate any of these problems since, even under very heavy load. The process is also much more idle (nearly completely used w/ 8169 and about 30-70% idle most of the time, more than 50 quite often, with the later card).

I do not know if the 8169 chipset is just broken or if the driver is, but the problem lies with one of the two.

Comment 2 Chuck Ebbert 2011-07-19 12:47:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 710841 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.