Bug 711610 - Aeolus web page "Get It" provides incomplete install info for stable
Summary: Aeolus web page "Get It" provides incomplete install info for stable
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: Documentation
Version: 0.3.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Justin Clift
QA Contact: wes hayutin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-07 22:00 UTC by William Henry
Modified: 2015-07-13 04:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-13 19:38:51 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description William Henry 2011-06-07 22:00:55 UTC
Description of problem:

Tried to install Aeolus on Fedora 14 using the information provided:

http://www.aeolusproject.org/get_it.html#stable

This Page does not provide adequate information on how to install.

Following the instructions including the wget and the yum install generates yum errors.

1. Run $ sudo wget -O /etc/yum.repos.d/rhel-aeolus.repo \
  http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/aeolus/conductor/0.2.0/rhel-aeolus.repo

2. Run $ sudo yum install aeolus-conductor-daemons aeolus-conductor-doc imagefactory

3. Get :
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: condor-7.6.0-2dcloud.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
           Requires: libdeltacloud.so.5()(64bit)
           Available: libdeltacloud-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
               libdeltacloud.so.5()(64bit)
           Installed: libdeltacloud-0.8-1.fc14.x86_64 (@updates)
               Not found
Error: Package: condor-7.6.0-2dcloud.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
           Requires: libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_0.0.0)(64bit)
           Available: libdeltacloud-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
               libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_0.0.0)(64bit)
           Installed: libdeltacloud-0.8-1.fc14.x86_64 (@updates)
               Not found
Error: Package: condor-7.6.0-2dcloud.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
           Requires: libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_1.0.0)(64bit)
           Available: libdeltacloud-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
               libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_1.0.0)(64bit)
           Installed: libdeltacloud-0.8-1.fc14.x86_64 (@updates)
               Not found
Error: Package: condor-7.6.0-2dcloud.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
           Requires: libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_2.0.0)(64bit)
           Available: libdeltacloud-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora-aeolus)
               libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_2.0.0)(64bit)
           Installed: libdeltacloud-0.8-1.fc14.x86_64 (@updates)
               Not found

4. Run $ sudo yum install libdeltacloud

5. Repeat 2 and get repeat 3. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Lalancette 2011-06-08 12:50:22 UTC
Right, this is because the libdeltacloud RPMs have moved on, and the 0.2.0 repositories still need the old RPMs.  Unfortunately this is going to be something that will happen from time-to-time, since fedora is a live, wriggling beast.

I think a workaround, if and only if you are using 0.2.0, is to remove libdeltacloud (yum remove 'libdeltacloud*'), and then install the packages using "yum install --disablerepo=updates aeolus-configure aeolus-conductor-daemons".  That should get you the correct version of the packages.

Chris Lalancette

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2011-06-13 13:45:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 711112 ***

Comment 3 Justin Clift 2011-06-13 14:30:31 UTC
This may not be a duplicate.

In the initial bug report, Henry appears to be using the RHEL repo's, note the Fedora one, so it may be a different issue from what we're expecting.

William, can you confirm you're trying to install on RHEL 6.1, not Fedora?

Comment 4 Justin Clift 2011-06-13 19:38:51 UTC
Ugh, ignore my last comment.  William clearly says he's using F14, even though the repo line pasted was for RHEL.  (likely a cut-n-paste error when creating this bug).

This is a duplicate after all.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 711112 ***

Comment 5 wes hayutin 2011-12-08 14:05:33 UTC
perm close


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.