RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 711636 - THP has a build error when !CONFIG_SMP
Summary: THP has a build error when !CONFIG_SMP
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andrea Arcangeli
QA Contact: WANG Chao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-08 02:26 UTC by Cong Wang
Modified: 2015-02-08 21:42 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.32-169.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 13:33:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:1530 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 kernel security, bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:45:35 UTC

Description Cong Wang 2011-06-08 02:26:47 UTC
Description of problem:

Wade reported a compile error of el6 kernel on Fedora

arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h:98:20: warning: conflicting types for ‘native_pmd_clear’ [enabled by default]
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h:98:20: error: static declaration of ‘native_pmd_clear’ follows non-static declaration
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h:87:2: note: previous implicit declaration of ‘native_pmd_clear’ was here

which is caused by the following commit:

commit 27473d67d4d15abf02179c99d9e02ef72e0c478a
Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange>
Date:   Mon Feb 1 15:17:11 2010 -0500

    [mm] add pmd mangling functions to x86

This is due to,

+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+       return native_make_pmd(xchg(&xp->pmd, 0));
+#else
+       /* native_local_pmdp_get_and_clear,
+          but duplicated because of cyclic dependency */
+       pmd_t ret = *xp;
+       native_pmd_clear(NULL, 0, xp);    <============= This line
+       return ret;
+#endif

while the prototype of native_pmd_clear() is

 static inline void native_pmd_clear(pmd_t *pmd) 

Additional info:

Since we don't support modified .config, this problem is not serious.

Comment 4 Aristeu Rozanski 2011-07-18 15:27:49 UTC
Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-169.el6

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-18 16:00:16 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 13:33:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1530.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.