Bug 712270 (ghc-derive) - Review Request: ghc-derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Summary: Review Request: ghc-derive - A program and library to derive instances for da...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: ghc-derive
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Shakthi Kannan
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ghc-pointedlist
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-10 04:21 UTC by Narasimhan
Modified: 2014-11-12 23:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ghc-derive-2.5.11-3.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-10 01:33:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
shakthimaan: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Narasimhan 2011-06-10 04:21:18 UTC
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec

SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm

Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647

rpmlint output:

derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum                                        
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.                                                        
                                                                                                                            
derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary.  This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output.  Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.

derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary.  This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output.  Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.

ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.

Required for yi

Comment 1 Narasimhan 2012-05-06 04:35:02 UTC
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-derive.spec

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc15.src.rpm

rpmlint output:
rpmlint  -i ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-derive-devel-2.5.8-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc15.src.rpm ../ghc-derive.specghc-derive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Comment 2 Shakthi Kannan 2012-05-25 18:08:43 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated

==== C/C++ ====
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[-]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[-]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[-]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
     present.
     Note: ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc18.i686.rpm :
     /usr/lib/ghc-7.4.1/derive-2.5.8/libHSderive-2.5.8-ghc7.4.1.so

Waived. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages.

[-]: MUST Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.

==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.

Waived. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc18.i686.rpm

ghc-derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

rpmlint ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc18.src.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint ghc-derive-devel-2.5.8-1.fc18.i686.rpm

ghc-derive-devel.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided ghc-derive-doc
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Waived.

[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/shaks/rpmbuild/SRPMS/712270/derive-2.5.8.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package     : e970a39db478eb83710edb8f94c9b4ab
  MD5SUM upstream package : e970a39db478eb83710edb8f94c9b4ab

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:

Generated by fedora-review 0.1.3
External plugins:

APPROVED.

Comment 3 Narasimhan 2012-05-26 16:36:42 UTC
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-derive
Short Description: A program and library to derive instances for data types
Owners: narasim
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC: haskell-sig

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-27 01:45:17 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2012-05-31 06:03:41 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc16

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2012-05-31 06:03:57 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc17

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-06-01 17:02:15 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-06-10 01:33:50 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-06-10 01:35:58 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.8-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

Comment 10 Jens Petersen 2014-10-23 03:47:21 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: ghc-derive
New Branches: epel7
Owners: petersen
InitialCC: haskell-sig

Comment 11 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-10-23 12:19:58 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2014-10-24 09:54:42 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.11-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-derive-2.5.11-3.el7

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2014-11-12 23:19:19 UTC
ghc-derive-2.5.11-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.