Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 713501
Inconsistency in how "runas" is termed.
Last modified: 2015-01-04 18:49:20 EST
Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ipa-server-2.0.0-25.el6.x86_64 ipa-admintools-2.0.0-25.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: # ipa sudorule-find rule1 --all dn: ipauniqueid=e70200e8-975e-11e0-9644-525400deab7b,cn=sudorules,cn=sudo,dc=lab,dc=eng,dc=pnq,dc=redhat,dc=com Rule name: rule1 Enabled: TRUE Run As Group: sudogrp1, sudogrp2 <<<<<<<<<<<<< RunAs External Group: tgroup1, tgroup2, tgroup3 <<<<<<<<<<<<< ipauniqueid: e70200e8-975e-11e0-9644-525400deab7b objectclass: ipaassociation, ipasudorule ---------------------------- Number of entries returned 1 ---------------------------- Actual results: Inconsistency in how "runas" is termed. - for groups we have it as "Run As Group" - for external group we have it as "RunAs External Group" This inconsistency makes automation messy too. Expected results: Should be consistent in the term "RunAs". Additional info:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1328
master: 9dfdf55034223e05c72e59239169be8cf315fc29 ipa-2-0: 6154c35046ba87067901c7dd14edad79b8d23fa5
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Do not document
dn: ipauniqueid=af06741c-04a0-11e1-af83-00215e258b54,cn=sudorules,cn=sudo,dc=testrelm Rule name: rule1 Enabled: TRUE RunAs External Group: tgroup3, tgroup4, tgroup5, tgroup6 RunAs Groups: sudogrp1, sudogrp2, sudogrp3, sudogrp4, sudogrp5, sudogrp6 ipauniqueid: af06741c-04a0-11e1-af83-00215e258b54 objectclass: ipaassociation, ipasudorule Verified. Version: ipa-server-2.1.3-7.el6.x86_64
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1533.html