Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 713603
[ipa webui] inconsistent user member list
Last modified: 2015-01-04 18:49:20 EST
Description of problem: IPA supports nested group. That means for one group, there are direct user members and in-direct members (member in nested groups). However, in Web UI, if one group has no direct user member, the UI page will show no user member at all. As long as there is one direct user member, all direct members and indirecst member will show up. This listing feature is inconsistent. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ipa-server-selinux-2.0.0-23.el6.i686 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. create nested group: grp2 is member of grp1 2. let user21 and user22 is direct member of grp2, and user11 and user12 is direct member of grp1 3. when check user list for grp1, we can see all 4 users: user11, user12, user21, user22 are listed 4. now delete user11 and user22 from grp1 5. go back to same user list page for grp1, there is no user listed at all. Expected results: I expect the user listing behave is consistent: if we decide to show indirect member, then regardless if there is direct member, we should always show indirect member. Vise versa. Additional info:
Please retest using a daily build
I am not seeing any issues with displaying direct and/or indirect members with the newest build, but I would like Yi to take a look as I am not exactly sure of the scenario he was testing.
Any update?
my bug report based on the 6.1 release. And I don't see the same issue on the daily build. This bug can be closed as verified
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Do not document
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1533.html