Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 713603 - [ipa webui] inconsistent user member list
[ipa webui] inconsistent user member list
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ipa (Show other bugs)
6.0
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Crittenden
Chandrasekar Kannan
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-06-15 17:55 EDT by Yi Zhang
Modified: 2015-01-04 18:49 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: ipa-2.1.0-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Do not document
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 13:34:02 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:1533 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: ipa security and bug fix update 2011-12-05 20:23:31 EST

  None (edit)
Description Yi Zhang 2011-06-15 17:55:47 EDT
Description of problem:
IPA supports nested group. That means for one group, there are direct user members and in-direct members (member in nested groups).
However, in Web UI, if one group has no direct user member, the UI page will show no user member at all. As long as there is one direct user member, all direct members and indirecst member will show up. This listing feature is inconsistent. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ipa-server-selinux-2.0.0-23.el6.i686


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. create nested group: grp2 is member of grp1
2. let user21 and user22 is direct member of grp2, and user11 and user12 is direct member of grp1
3. when check user list for grp1, we can see all 4 users: user11, user12, user21, user22 are listed
4. now delete user11 and user22 from grp1
5. go back to same user list page for grp1, there is no user listed at all.
  
Expected results:
I expect the user listing behave is consistent: if we decide to show indirect member, then regardless if there is direct member, we should always show indirect member. Vise versa. 

Additional info:
Comment 2 Rob Crittenden 2011-06-16 11:03:57 EDT
Please retest using a daily build
Comment 3 Jenny Galipeau 2011-06-24 11:15:26 EDT
I am not seeing any issues with displaying direct and/or indirect members with the newest build, but I would like Yi to take a look as I am not exactly sure of the scenario he was testing.
Comment 4 Dmitri Pal 2011-06-27 18:52:48 EDT
Any update?
Comment 5 Yi Zhang 2011-07-19 13:23:32 EDT
my bug report based on the 6.1 release. And I don't see the same issue on the daily build. This bug can be closed as verified
Comment 6 Rob Crittenden 2011-10-31 16:06:29 EDT
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Do not document
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 13:34:02 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1533.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.