Bug 714408 - Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface
Summary: Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-19 04:11 UTC by Khusro Jaleel
Modified: 2011-12-05 18:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-05 18:25:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kevin: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Khusro Jaleel 2011-06-19 04:11:51 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description: League Gothic is a revival of an old classic, Alternate Gothic No.1.
It was originally designed by Morris Fuller Benton for the American
Type Founders Company (ATF) in 1903. The company went bankrupt in 1993.
And since the original typeface was created before 1923, the typeface
is in the public domain. It is a sans serif gothic typeface

NOTE: This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. In addition, some hosting space, perhaps on fedorapeople.org would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Comment 1 Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) 2011-06-26 16:48:26 UTC
I inspected the spec file, and it seems to match the guidelines listed:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template

it also passed rpmlint cleanly. 

I would recommend publishing a koji scratch build.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2011-07-02 14:11:29 UTC
I'd be happy to review this package and look at sponsoring you. ;) 

Look for a full review hopefully later today.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2011-07-02 15:56:39 UTC
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (OFL)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
72b228695f1ad8ac0e3824a1e7edb313  league-gothic.zip
72b228695f1ad8ac0e3824a1e7edb313  ../SOURCES/league-gothic.zip
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have sane scriptlets. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. Not a blocker, but you might add to the description. Reading just what you have
makes it sound like this is a public domain font from 1903, but in fact the second
paragraph upstream says: "We decided to make our own version, and contribute 
it to the Open Source Type Movement. It’s free, not only in price, but in freedom"
So, perhaps a note that this is a version of that font? 

2. Might ask upstream if they could include a copy of the OFL in their zip file?
(Not a blocker, but nice to have). 

3. rpmlint says: 

tlomt-league-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Which can be ignored. 

Fix up the description and I think we are good to go...

Comment 4 Khusro Jaleel 2011-07-02 22:44:14 UTC
Thanks, Kevin. I have updated the description field now and uploaded a new .src.rpm with an incremented Release tag of "2". You will find it below:

SRPM: http://kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts-1.0-2.fc15.src.rpm
SPEC: http://kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts.spec
Koji scratch build against Rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3176288

Please let me know if this is ok, thanks again for the help. I'm going to package up another font soon!

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2011-07-03 14:02:44 UTC
Looks good. This package is APPROVED. 

I will go ahead and sponsor you. Can you confirm your fedora account system account name for me in email or irc (my nick on irc is 'nirik') ?

Please don't hesitate to ask questions and I will assist you as best I can. After I sponsor you in the account system you can continue the process from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-07-05 00:07:42 UTC
Please complete a SCM request if setting the fedora-cvs flag.

Comment 7 Khusro Jaleel 2011-07-05 04:57:25 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts
Short Description: League Gothic is a revival of an old classic, Alternate Gothic
No.1.
Owners: kjaleel
Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6
InitialCC: fonts-sig

Comment 8 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-07-05 07:32:02 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 9 Paul Flo Williams 2011-11-30 07:42:47 UTC
Khusro, could you please complete some builds of this and push them as updates so this review gets closed off?

Comment 10 Khusro Jaleel 2011-12-05 10:22:37 UTC
Hi Paul, apologies for the late reply here, I was hoping to find some time to re-read the package review guidelines document to find out what I was missing before asking you, but I haven't had much time to do so.

As far as I was aware, I have already created the package and done a koji build, etc and the package is now part of F16, so I am not sure what is left remaining to be done? Could you please let me know?

Thanks.

Comment 11 Paul Flo Williams 2011-12-05 18:25:06 UTC
OK, I can see the build for F16, but Bodhi isn't showing any updates. Closing now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.