libpqxx-3.0.2-4.fc13.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug. If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one. Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created. Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
Created attachment 509162 [details] root.log root.log for i386
Created attachment 509163 [details] build.log build.log for i386
Created attachment 509164 [details] mock.log mock.log for i386
Created attachment 509165 [details] root.log root.log for x86_64
Created attachment 509166 [details] build.log build.log for x86_64
Created attachment 509167 [details] mock.log mock.log for x86_64
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3174555
This FTBFS needs to be fixed in F15 as well for koffice and a few other applications to build in the arm secondary arch.
Andreas, where did you get libpqxx-3.2 from? I see 3.1 as the latest... everywhere on http://pqxx.org/development/libpqxx/
My guess is what was used here was a scm snapshot of 3.2 development (which is tracking 4.0 now). I'm not sure how practical it will be to backport ftbfs fixes back to 3.0 (what was included in f15). backporting to upstream's stable 3.1 release may be hard enough. I'm of a mind just to merge what's in f16+ back to f15 branch and call it good. any other opinions or recommendations?
I am pretty sure I pulled this from libpqxx webpage as part of fixing this bug... I will have a look.
This package appears to be building successfully on all current branches: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2389