Hide Forgot
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #681331 +++ Created attachment 481707 [details] c++ program to send and receive messages; shell script that runs full test and demonstrates failure; makefile included Description of problem: When an exchange is declared with an alternate-exchange on one node of a cluster, other nodes in the cluster are not made aware of the alternate-exchange. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.7.946106-28_ptc_hotfix_5 How reproducible: 100% of the time Steps to Reproduce: 1. download attachment and untar all files to a single folder 2. run poc.sh 3. See comments in poc.sh to follow what's happening step-by-step Actual results: Within the output, you will see the following: <<< Message 1 was not received. Message 2 received! >>> Message 1 was sent to 1.Ex, which was created on a different node. Message 2 was sent to 2.Ex, which was created on the same node. The script then calls qpid-stat. You’ll see that only Message 2 (98 bytes) was received by Alternate.Ex. Message 1 (9 bytes) was dropped by 1.Ex without being received by Alternate.Ex. Expected results: Both Message 1 and Message 2 should be received. In qpid-stat, Alternate.Ex should show msgIn=2, msgOut=2, byteIn=107(== 98+9), byteOut=107 Additional info: --- Additional comment from agoldste on 2011-03-01 14:03:46 EST --- This appears to happen only when a node is restarted or a new node is added, i.e. nodes playing catch-up aren't told about the alternate exchange. --- Additional comment from aconway on 2011-03-02 16:08:46 EST --- Fixed on upstream trunk r1076375 --- Additional comment from aconway on 2011-03-11 17:03:55 EST --- Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Cause: Running a cluster and using alternate exchanges. Consequence: Alternate exchange settings were not propagated to new cluster members. Fix: Corrected the cluster update process to include alternate exchanges. Result: Alternate exchanges work as expected in a cluster. --- Additional comment from pematous on 2011-04-07 11:50:09 EDT --- This issue has been fixed Verified on RHEL5.6 and RHEL6.1, architectures: i386, x86_64 packages installed: qpid-cpp-mrg-debuginfo-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-client-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-server-devel-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-server-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-client-devel-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-client-devel-docs-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-server-xml-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-server-cluster-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-server-store-0.10-1.el5 qpid-cpp-server-ssl-0.10-1.el5 openais-0.80.6-28.el5 openais-devel-0.80.6-28.el5 openais-devel-0.80.6-28.el5 ( RHEL6 corosynclib-1.2.3-34.el6.x86_64 corosync-1.2.3-34.el6.x86_64 ) -> VERIFIED --- Additional comment from errata-xmlrpc on 2011-06-23 11:44:01 EDT --- An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0890.html
This issue has been fixed Verified on RHEL5.7, architectures: i386, x86_64 packages installed: python-qpid-0.7.946106-15.el5 qpid-cpp-client-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-client-devel-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-client-devel-docs-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-server-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-server-cluster-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-server-devel-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-server-ssl-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-server-store-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-cpp-server-xml-0.7.946106-33.el5 qpid-java-client-0.10-6.el5 qpid-java-common-0.10-6.el5 qpid-java-example-0.10-6.el5 qpid-tools-0.7.946106-12.el5 -> VERIFIED
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1147.html