Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 717726
[ipa webui] Config: Name on the configuration page is irrelevant and means nothing to an admin
Last modified: 2015-01-04 18:49:40 EST
Created attachment 510503 [details] screenshot Description of problem: The Name field on the IPA Server Configuration page, really means nothing to an administrator. The field is irrelevant and really is not necessary. If it was possible to create more than one configuration, it would be different. At minimim, it should not be an editable field that gives an incorrect error if you attempt to modify it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ipa-server-2.0.99-2.20110629T0200zgit66eeace.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Log into IPA Server Web UI ad admin 2. IPA Server ---> Configuration 3. Attempt to modify "Name" Actual results: incorrect error message Expected results: Minimum: Not an editable field Ideal: Not to display an the name with is irrelevant at this time to the administrator. Additional info:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1404
master: 21dd4a2a826ae6572bdddf72ec42d8a0e3571cd0
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Do not document
"Name" no longer displayed in "Configuration". [root@decepticons ~]# rpm -qi ipa-server Name : ipa-server Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.1.3 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. Release : 8.el6 Build Date: Wed 02 Nov 2011 03:21:27 AM IST Install Date: Thu 03 Nov 2011 10:13:53 AM IST Build Host: x86-012.build.bos.redhat.com Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: ipa-2.1.3-8.el6.src.rpm Size : 3381421 License: GPLv3+ Signature : (none) Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> URL : http://www.freeipa.org/ Summary : The IPA authentication server
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1533.html