Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/jpathwatch/jpathwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-0.94-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: jpatchwatch is a Java library for monitoring directories for changes. It uses the host platform’s native OS functions to achieve this to avoid polling. The following events on a directory can be monitored: - File creation and deletion - File modification - File renaming - Changes in subdirectories (recursive monitoring) - Invalidation (a watched directory becomes unavailable)
Please wait with the review till #718281 is resolved. I'll alter the package accordingly.
Altered to place jar in the jnidir ... Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/jpathwatch/2/jpathwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/jpathwatch/2/jpathwatch-0.94-2.fc15.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Rpmlint output: jpathwatch.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jpatchwatch -> deathwatch jpathwatch.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subdirectories -> sub directories, sub-directories, directories OK. jpathwatch.i686: E: no-binary jpathwatch.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib False positives because there is a jar with so file in it. [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1]. [x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2]. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [x] Buildroot definition is not present [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4]. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5]. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with good reason [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore) [x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing) [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks) [x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils [x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils [x] Package uses %global not %define [x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...) [-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building [x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details) [-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [-] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom file (use "JPP." and "JPP-" correctly) === Other suggestions === [X] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac) [X] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary [-] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible) [X] Latest version is packaged. [X] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Good package. APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: jpathwatch Short Description: Java library for monitoring directories for changes Owners: jcapik Branches: f15 InitialCC: java-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests). Alexander, in the future, please take ownership of Review bugs you're working on. Thank you!
Sorry about that.
jpathwatch-0.94-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jpathwatch-0.94-2.fc15
jpathwatch-0.94-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.
jpathwatch-0.94-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.