Bug 718608 - MinorMod: FTP: Missing text fragment in vsftpd configuration documentation
Summary: MinorMod: FTP: Missing text fragment in vsftpd configuration documentation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Deployment_Guide
Version: 5.7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jaromir Hradilek
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-04 01:00 UTC by Jaromir Hradilek
Modified: 2012-02-21 05:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 715016
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 05:19:27 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0178 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Deployment_Guide bug fix and enhancement update 2012-02-20 14:54:56 UTC

Description Jaromir Hradilek 2011-07-04 01:00:27 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #715016 +++

In the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Deployment Guide", edition 1 (PDF version) in section 17.2.5.2 Log In Options and Access Controls (p.362) there is a bullet item list of directives to configure vsftpd.
Between directives "pam_service_name" and "userlist_deny", there is a bullet item that only says what the default value is, but not for which directive. This is different from the surrounding directives' descriptions and most likely an omission of text.

--- Additional comment from jhradile on 2011-07-03 20:53:07 EDT ---

Hi,

And many thanks for reporting this. This is indeed an error, and will be fixed in the next release.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 05:19:27 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0178.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.