Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Playing around with deployables, I found that dropping a character from either the image id or the build id is flagged as an error prior to adding the deployable, stating that the particular id could not be found. But, if you do this with the hw profile name, it is not flagged as an error until you actually start the deployable which is a little late, especially in multi-assembly deployments. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): aeolus-configure-2.0.1-0.el6.20110628141215gitb8aaf85.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.0.1-1.el6.20110701204941gitd66e27c.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.3.0-0.el6.20110701204941gitd66e27c.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.3.0-0.el6.20110701204941gitd66e27c.noarch aeolus-all-0.3.0-0.el6.20110701204941gitd66e27c.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.3.0-0.el6.20110701204941gitd66e27c.noarch Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a deployable xml with a bad build id 2. Create a new deployment for a pool specifying xml from step 1 3. Notice an error is thrown on a bad id and the deployable is not added 4. Create a deployable xml and specify a non-existent hw profile 5. Create a new deployment for a pool specifying xml from step 4 6. Notice that the bad hw profile is not flagged as a error and you can proceed to starting the deployment. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
4cd3a5eec2639018d8598ebbfc836dd77e1f6635 is in rpm on fp testing
Looks good with the following rpms: [root@ibm-x3650-04 ~]# rpm -qa | grep aeolus rubygem-aeolus-image-0.0.1-1.el6.20110719153543gitd39221e.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.3.0-0.el6.20110719153543gitd39221e.noarch aeolus-all-0.3.0-0.el6.20110719153543gitd39221e.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.3.0-0.el6.20110719153543gitd39221e.noarch aeolus-configure-2.0.1-1.el6.20110719144238git5ffa131.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.3.0-0.el6.20110719153543gitd39221e.noarch
release pending...
perm close