Hide Forgot
Description of problem: system-config-firewall does not allow user to specify which eth interface, only displays eth+ which will apply rule to all interfaces. Works fine in the GUI, because it is a tree structure which can be expanded. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1 How reproducible: Very easy Steps to Reproduce: 1.run system-config-firewall 2. Buttons: Customize -> Forward -> Forward Actual results: eth+ shows in interface, cannot expand to show individual interfaces Expected results: Should expand or show all interfaces automagically Additional info:
Created attachment 512536 [details] Screenshot
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This bug makes it impossible to use the utility to set up masquerading in a typical scenario with two Ethernet ports for internal and external networks. Is there any expectation that this bug will ever be fixed?
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0837.html