Bug 722364 - Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser - Ruby bindings for Expat
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser - Ruby bindings for Expat
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 719854
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-15 02:18 UTC by Shawn Starr
Modified: 2011-07-17 17:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-17 17:57:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Shawn Starr 2011-07-15 02:18:48 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora/rubygem-xmlparser/rubygem-xmlparser.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora/rubygem-extlib/rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: Ruby bindings for Expat

Comments/review is certainly requested, this .gem from rubygems.org is badly built (missing files in the .gem itself but installs) but this is all we get unless we roll our own .gem.

Also note, the original author now has 0.7.2 but there is no .gem created and no other distros are packaging 0.7.2 (or know about it?)

This can be found here: http://www.yoshidam.net/Ruby.html

This package is needed for upcoming OpenNebula 3.0 support.

Comment 1 Shawn Starr 2011-07-15 02:25:16 UTC
In addition, the .gem does not provide Encoding support and if we do want this, we need 0.7.2.

I do not know of Fedora's policy for packaging non-gem .gem packages vs .gem packages. We could roll our own .gem of 0.7.2. but I don't know the policy of this.

Comment 2 Ulrich Schwickerath 2011-07-15 06:06:54 UTC
Shawn,

are you aware of this request ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854

Same context. This gem is actually needed for ONE 2.2 already. If it's not there the performance is really bad. 

I wonder if this new bug is a duplicate.

Comment 3 Shawn Starr 2011-07-15 15:23:37 UTC
Its needed for OpenNebula 3.0 (not released yet), I am working with upstream, although it's interesting someone else is trying to package this :)

i don't care who wants to own it, we need it as a dependency however 2.2 and 3.0.

Comment 4 Shawn Starr 2011-07-15 15:27:52 UTC
<jmelis> first beta is scheduled for beginning of next week
<jmelis> after that will come a beta2
<jmelis> and a release candidate
<jmelis> OpenNebula 3.0 final is scheduled for end of august

Comment 5 Shawn Starr 2011-07-17 17:57:22 UTC
Close it, will focus on other dependencies needed to get OpenNebula 3.0 into Fedora.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 719854 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.