Description of problem: I'm trying to update ada tools to new version. But some packages (such as gprbuild, ASIS, aunit etc) require sources of GNAT because there's not GNAT-GPL in Fedora (we're using GCC instead) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gcc-gnat-4.6.0-9.fc15.x86_64 libgnat-4.6.0-9.fc15.x86_64 How reproduce: Try to package gprbuild from AdaCore. Actual results: Incomplete sources in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/adainclude/ Expected results: Successfull build Additional info: Please package *.ads and *.adb files from %{sourcedir}/gcc/ada to devel package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ada#Devel_packages
Created attachment 513515 [details] Diff between fedora and upstream gcc/ada folders
Does Gnat GPL really install all of those files in its adainclude directory, or did you compare the API of Libgnat against the complete combined sources of Gnat and Libgnat? GPRbuild 2010 seemed to build fine. If GPRbuild 2011 requires new features in Gnat, then perhaps Fedora should just stick to GPRbuild 2010 until those features make their way into a GCC release? ASIS is a special case. I hear it needs to be tightly synchronized with Gnat, so it will probably take some effort to package. I doubt that the solution is as simple as dropping a bunch of files in the adainclude directory. I've been meaning to study how Ludovic solves that in Debian.
(In reply to comment #2) > Does Gnat GPL really install all of those files in its adainclude directory, or > did you compare the API of Libgnat against the complete combined sources of > Gnat and Libgnat? Please see /lib/gnat/gnat_util.gpr of Gnat-GPL (Adacore) installation. > GPRbuild 2010 seemed to build fine. If GPRbuild 2011 requires new features in > Gnat, then perhaps Fedora should just stick to GPRbuild 2010 until those > features make their way into a GCC release? Yes, It contain includes from __GNAT-GPL__ (not from GCC-GNAT). GNAT-GPL-2911 contains parts of SPARK (for example). Please read README file for gprbuild-{2910,2011} > ASIS is a special case. I hear it needs to be tightly synchronized with Gnat, > so it will probably take some effort to package. I doubt that the solution is > as simple as dropping a bunch of files in the adainclude directory. I've been > meaning to study how Ludovic solves that in Debian. I'm using GELA for qtada. ASIS needs to be tightly synchronized with Gnat, so GCC-GNAT must bring sources as well as any Ada programs in -devel package.
We are shipping whatever upstream GCC-GNAT decided that should be installed.
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > We are shipping whatever upstream GCC-GNAT decided that should be installed. It's not true we have bunch of "cp" operations in specfile already, for example: cp -a ../gcc/jit/libgccjit*.h %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/include/ and we ship something different from upstream gcc-gnat even ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211957 ) The idea is to introduce libgnat-source package to ship content of gcc/ada. This package should be used only in BuildRequirements of gprbuild (and maybe ASIS) packages. Like we have in ocaml-source for example. Actually gprbuild uses built-in gnat-sources which are gcc-4 branch and broken with gcc-5.
This bug is currently assigned to an unsupported release. If you think this bug is still valid and should remain open, please re-assign it to a supported release (F22, F23) or to rawhide. Bugs which will be assigned to an unsupported release are going to be closed as EOL (End Of Life) on January 26th, 2016.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days