Bug 722848 - [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:586 proc_register+0x155/0x192(): TAINTED ---------W
Summary: [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:586 proc_register+0x155/0x192():...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 679452
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 15
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:50ef22c25eb4d15ab2b72952ae5...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-18 08:48 UTC by Adrien Bustany
Modified: 2011-09-27 16:22 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-27 16:22:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adrien Bustany 2011-07-18 08:48:00 UTC
abrt version: 2.0.3
architecture:   x86_64
cmdline:        ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_chatouilleux-lv_root rd_LUKS_UUID=luks-cec09ed9-7451-4839-97fb-bd9165aa5e18 rd_LVM_LV=vg_chatouilleux/lv_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_chatouilleux/lv_swap rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYTABLE=uk rhgb quiet
comment:        Resume from s2ram maybe? Laptop is a Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3T
component:      kernel
kernel:         2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64
kernel_tainted: 512
kernel_tainted_long: Taint on warning.
os_release:     Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
package:        kernel
reason:         WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:586 proc_register+0x155/0x192()
time:           Mon Jul 11 21:00:43 2011

backtrace:
:WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:586 proc_register+0x155/0x192()
:Hardware name: 20040M18        
:proc_dir_entry 'power/PWRB' already registered
:Modules linked in:
:Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64 #1
:Call Trace:
: [<ffffffff8105511a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
: [<ffffffff810551d5>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
: [<ffffffff811704d9>] proc_register+0x155/0x192
: [<ffffffff81170969>] proc_mkdir_mode+0x3f/0x57
: [<ffffffff81170997>] proc_mkdir+0x16/0x18
: [<ffffffff8129adcf>] acpi_button_add+0x228/0x3e2
: [<ffffffff81277c3e>] acpi_device_probe+0x4e/0x11c
: [<ffffffff812e69e5>] driver_probe_device+0x124/0x1ff
: [<ffffffff812e6b1a>] __driver_attach+0x5a/0x7e
: [<ffffffff812e6ac0>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x7e
: [<ffffffff812e5a86>] bus_for_each_dev+0x53/0x89
: [<ffffffff812e65f2>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
: [<ffffffff812e6204>] bus_add_driver+0xe2/0x235
: [<ffffffff81b8dc7d>] ? acpi_button_init+0x0/0x56
: [<ffffffff812e6d03>] driver_register+0x98/0x105
: [<ffffffff81b8dc7d>] ? acpi_button_init+0x0/0x56
: [<ffffffff81279218>] acpi_bus_register_driver+0x43/0x45
: [<ffffffff81b8dcb1>] acpi_button_init+0x34/0x56
: [<ffffffff810020a4>] do_one_initcall+0x7f/0x137
: [<ffffffff81b58e68>] kernel_init+0x22d/0x2a7
: [<ffffffff8100a9e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
: [<ffffffff81b58c3b>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x2a7
: [<ffffffff8100a9e0>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10

Comment 1 Josh Boyer 2011-09-27 16:22:07 UTC
This looks to be a dupe of 679452

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 679452 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.