Bug 723558 - ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Summary: ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ghc-X11
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jens Petersen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-20 15:08 UTC by Evan Dale Aromin
Modified: 2011-12-03 07:13 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-03 07:13:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
yum.log since the time of Fedora 15 installation (25.38 KB, text/plain)
2011-07-21 03:52 UTC, Evan Dale Aromin
no flags Details
/root/install.log (52.93 KB, text/x-log)
2011-07-27 15:54 UTC, Evan Dale Aromin
no flags Details

Description Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-20 15:08:18 UTC
Description of problem:
xmonad --recompile reports missing libX11.so library when the command is invoked on an x64 system. This is because libX11.x86_64 is not installed as a dependency when xmonad.x86_64 is installed through yum. Installing libX11.x86_64 fixes the problem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
   Name        : xmonad
   Arch        : x86_64
   Version     : 0.9.2
   Release     : 8.fc15

How reproducible: always (100%)


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install the x86_64 versions of xmonad, ghc-xmonad-contrib, ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel, and xmonad-gnome
2. Create a minimal xmonad config in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs
3. Invoke `xmonad --recompile` in a terminal
  
Actual results:
`xmonad --recompile` fails with linking errors due to a missing libX11.so

Expected results:
libX11.x86_64 should be pulled as a dependency when xmonad.x86_64 is installed to prevent the linking problem when `xmonad --recompile` is invoked.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2011-07-21 03:27:07 UTC
Hmm, sounds little a suspicious: all of
xmonad-core.x86_64, ghc-xmonad-contrib.x86_64 should
pull in libX11.x86_64.

Did you start from a minimal install or convert from a 32bit install
or something weird like that?

Could you please attach the relevant output from yum.log?

Comment 2 Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-21 03:50:39 UTC
My system is a fresh Fedora 15 x64 installation using the x64 minimal iso. Here are some points in yum.log that might be relevant:

Jul 12 06:08:20 Installed: libX11-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
Jul 16 00:25:16 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686

...

Jul 18 01:06:14 Installed: ghc-base-4.3.1.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:14 Installed: ghc-old-locale-1.0.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:14 Installed: ghc-old-time-1.0.0.6-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:15 Installed: ghc-unix-2.4.2.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:15 Installed: ghc-filepath-1.2.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:16 Installed: ghc-directory-1.1.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:16 Installed: ghc-array-0.3.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:16 Installed: ghc-process-1.0.1.5-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:17 Installed: ghc-syb-0.3-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:17 Installed: ghc-X11-1.5.0.0-11.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:18 Installed: ghc-time-1.2.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:18 Installed: ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-6.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:18 Installed: ghc-mtl-2.0.1.0-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:19 Installed: ghc-random-1.0.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:19 Installed: ghc-containers-0.4.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:20 Installed: ghc-bytestring-0.9.1.10-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:20 Installed: ghc-extensible-exceptions-0.1.1.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:20 Installed: ghc-xmonad-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:21 Installed: ghc-utf8-string-0.3.6-9.fc15.1.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:21 Installed: ghc-haskell98-1.1.0.1-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:21 Installed: ghc-X11-xft-0.3-15.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:23 Installed: libmpc-0.8.3-0.3.svn855.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:23 Installed: libXext-devel-1.2.0-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:24 Installed: libXinerama-devel-1.1.1-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:25 Installed: cpp-4.6.0-9.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:26 Installed: ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.9.2-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:26 Installed: libXrender-devel-0.9.6-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:27 Installed: kernel-headers-2.6.38.8-35.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:28 Installed: glibc-headers-2.14-4.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:29 Installed: glibc-devel-2.14-4.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:29 Installed: ppl-pwl-0.11.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:30 Installed: ppl-0.11.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:30 Installed: cloog-ppl-0.15.9-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:33 Installed: gcc-4.6.0-9.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:33 Installed: 1:gmp-devel-4.3.2-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:34 Installed: xorg-x11-apps-7.6-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:34 Installed: zlib-devel-1.2.5-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:35 Installed: freetype-devel-2.4.4-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:36 Installed: fontconfig-devel-2.8.0-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:36 Installed: libXft-devel-2.2.0-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:36 Installed: xterm-268-1.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:37 Installed: xmonad-core-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:37 Installed: libffi-devel-3.0.9-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:40 Installed: ghc-7.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:44 Installed: ghc-base-devel-4.3.1.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:47 Installed: ghc-unix-devel-2.4.2.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:47 Installed: ghc-old-locale-devel-1.0.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:48 Installed: ghc-old-time-devel-1.0.0.6-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:48 Installed: ghc-filepath-devel-1.2.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:49 Installed: ghc-directory-devel-1.1.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:49 Installed: ghc-process-devel-1.0.1.5-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:50 Installed: ghc-extensible-exceptions-devel-0.1.1.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:50 Installed: ghc-array-devel-0.3.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:52 Installed: ghc-containers-devel-0.4.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:53 Installed: ghc-time-devel-1.2.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:54 Installed: ghc-random-devel-1.0.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:54 Installed: ghc-haskell98-devel-1.1.0.1-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:55 Installed: ghc-syb-devel-0.3-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:56 Installed: ghc-X11-devel-1.5.0.0-11.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:57 Installed: ghc-bytestring-devel-0.9.1.10-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:58 Installed: ghc-utf8-string-devel-0.3.6-9.fc15.1.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:59 Installed: ghc-X11-xft-devel-0.3-15.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:00 Installed: ghc-transformers-devel-0.2.2.0-6.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:00 Installed: ghc-mtl-devel-2.0.1.0-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:01 Installed: ghc-xmonad-devel-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:03 Installed: ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel-0.9.2-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:04 Installed: xmonad-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:04 Installed: xmonad-gnome-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64

...

Jul 20 22:45:06 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64

I'm attaching the whole yum.log in this report since there are a lot of i686 packages at the time of installation.

Comment 3 Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-21 03:52:20 UTC
Created attachment 514119 [details]
yum.log since the time of Fedora 15 installation

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2011-07-27 09:32:10 UTC
I see thanks -  I am still a bit confused.

What is the output of the following:

1. rpm -qa libX11\*
2. rpm -V ghc-X11

How exactly did you install F15 originally?

Comment 5 Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-27 12:26:52 UTC
You're welcome.

Here's the output for:

1. rpm -qa libX11\*

libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
libX11-common-1.4.3-1.fc15.noarch
libX11-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
libX11-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64

2. rpm -V ghc-X11

No output. So I verified if ghc-X11 is installed:

  yum list installed | grep ghc-X11
  ghc-X11.x86_64                      1.5.0.0-11.fc15                    @fedora    
  ghc-X11-devel.x86_64                1.5.0.0-11.fc15                    @fedora  
  ghc-X11-xft.x86_64                  0.3-15.fc15                        @fedora  
  ghc-X11-xft-devel.x86_64            0.3-15.fc15                        @fedora  

I installed F15 by selecting a mirror in http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/15/x86_64/. If I'm not mistaken I used a netinst iso found in http://fedora.inode.at/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-15-x86_64-netinst.iso.

Sorry if I can't remember the exact link location. I double checked the actual iso in my bootable usb and it's filename is Fedora-15-x86_64-netinst.iso. I opted to do a netinstall because I haven't found a working liveiso and I do not have a working Fedora installation to make one for myself.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2011-07-27 13:16:17 UTC
I see thank you.  Then could you also attach /root/install.log, please?
Would still like to get to the bottom of this.

Comment 7 Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-27 15:54:07 UTC
Created attachment 515551 [details]
/root/install.log

Sure. Here it is. Thank you!

Comment 8 Jens Petersen 2011-07-28 13:55:33 UTC
Ok I think this is a yum devel multilib issue.

Your install of libao.i686:

Jul 16 00:25:16 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
Jul 16 00:25:17 Installed: libao-1.0.0-3.fc15.i686

made

Jul 18 01:07:04 Installed: xmonad-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64

think that libX11-devel is already installed since it
can differentiate between x86_64 and i686.
So ideally the libX11-devel requires should specify
the arch.  Unfortunately short of a filepath requires
I am not very sure how to do that in rpm.

I guess:

Jul 20 22:45:06 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64

then fixed your problem, right?

Comment 9 Jens Petersen 2011-07-28 14:21:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> think that libX11-devel is already installed since it
> can differentiate between x86_64 and i686.

I mean can't.

> So ideally the libX11-devel requires should specify
> the arch.  Unfortunately short of a filepath requires
> I am not very sure how to do that in rpm.

Ok I just got educated on #fedora-devel about %{?_isa}
which should indeed fix this and avoid the problem
from reoccurring in the future.

Thank you very much for your report!

This should be fixed in xmonad-0.9.2-10.fc17.

* Thu Jul 28 2011 Jens Petersen <petersen> - 0.9.2-10
- add _isa to the ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel requires to avoid missing libX11.so
  when custom linking (reported by Evan Dale Aromin, #723558)

We may well backport this fix later to F16 and earlier.

Comment 10 Jens Petersen 2011-07-28 15:58:59 UTC
Erm, well above is for the similar but unlikely issue for haskell library devel packages.

The correct fix for C library devel packages is actually needed in ghc-rpm-macros, which handles ghc_pkg_c_deps.

Comment 11 Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-28 17:28:18 UTC
> I guess:
> 
> Jul 20 22:45:06 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> 
> then fixed your problem, right?

Yes. "yum provides */libX11.so" made me figure out what's needed.

Comment 12 Evan Dale Aromin 2011-07-28 17:33:24 UTC
> Thank you very much for your report!
> 
> This should be fixed in xmonad-0.9.2-10.fc17.

I'm glad to help. Thank you so much for answering back to my report!

> * Thu Jul 28 2011 Jens Petersen <petersen> - 0.9.2-10
> - add _isa to the ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel requires to avoid missing libX11.so
>   when custom linking (reported by Evan Dale Aromin, #723558)
> 
> We may well backport this fix later to F16 and earlier.

Until the fix is backported, should this be added to the F15 common bugs wiki?

Comment 13 Jens Petersen 2011-08-17 08:40:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> Until the fix is backported, should this be added to the F15 common bugs wiki?

That might be overkill: I don't know if anyone else has hit this problem?

Though I still wonder why libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686 was installed?

Having thought again about this I conclude that it is really up
to the individual libraries to add the %{_isa} to their requires.
Generically we can't be sure that an arbitrary -devel package is
arch or noarch: though no doubt yum could handle this better.

Comment 14 Jens Petersen 2011-08-17 09:30:07 UTC
I have made local changes to all the ghc-*.spec files that
use ghc_pkg_c_deps to append %{?_isa} to foreign devel deps,
and will commit those soon or next I rebuild the packages.

Comment 15 Jens Petersen 2011-12-03 07:13:46 UTC
Fixed in ghc-X11-1.5.0.0-13.fc17 and ghc-X11-xft-0.3.1-1.fc17.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.