Bug 723964 - fcoemon runs as initrc_t
Summary: fcoemon runs as initrc_t
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 832330
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-21 16:17 UTC by Steve Grubb
Modified: 2014-06-17 14:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-105.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 10:09:44 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1511 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 00:39:17 UTC

Description Steve Grubb 2011-07-21 16:17:22 UTC
Description of problem:
ps -eZ shows fcoemon as running under initrc_t. It comes from the fcoe-utils
package.

Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2011-07-22 20:13:47 UTC
What does it do?

Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2011-07-25 07:17:29 UTC
I added fcoemon policy to rawhide. But I won't add it to modules-targeted.conf. Maybe we can treat this policy with other.

Comment 4 Petr Šabata 2011-07-25 08:35:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> What does it do?

It reads configuration files in /etc, creates & destroys network interfaces and uses them.  Is that helpful?

(In reply to comment #3)
> I added fcoemon policy to rawhide. But I won't add it to modules-targeted.conf.
> Maybe we can treat this policy with other.

What exactly should be done in fcoe-utils?

Comment 6 Miroslav Grepl 2011-07-27 13:28:23 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-105.el6

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:09:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.