Hide Forgot
Date of First Response: 2009-09-10 01:12:33 securitylevel_name: Public Unmarshalling of persisted process instances containing variables failing. Marshalling / unmarshalling or process instances as part of the session also does not use the pluggable process instance marshallers. Working memory on unmarshalled process instances not set correctly.
Link: Added: This issue is related to JBRULES-2042
Fix in place.
For documenting this in the Release Notes, can you please confirm the following and fill in the missing information. Dot point explanations are fine: The CAUSE (what was actually broken) * Processes were persisting in working memory after being unmarshalled. * Working memory was not being set correctly and "pluggable process instance marshallers" were not being used. CONSEQUENCES of the bug (how it impacts users.) * The FIX (what was changed to eliminate this bug) and * RESULTS of the fix (what now happens for users.) *
We are still awaiting the outstanding information for the Release Notes on this one. Please provide it as soon as possible. Thanks.
Not sure this should be included, as it is part of unsupported features, but ... The CAUSE (what was actually broken) * Various issues when using the process instance marshallers CONSEQUENCES of the bug (how it impacts users.) * Persistence of running process instances was incorrect The FIX (what was changed to eliminate this bug) and * Various fixes to make sure the process instances are correctly marshalled and unmarshalled RESULTS of the fix (what now happens for users.) * Persistence of process instances should work correctly now.
NOTE: Inclusion of this in the release notes relies on confirmation as to whether it is in or not.
added to the 5.0.CP01 release notes as resolved: JBRULES-2042 Processes were persisting in working memory after being unmarshalled. Working memory was not being set correctly and "pluggable process instance marshallers" were not being used.