Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 724802 (BRMS-642)

Summary: The 'advanced enums' doesn't work on test scenario
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 Reporter: Amana <ajuricic>
Component: BRM (Guvnor)Assignee: manstis
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.1.0 GACC: mproctor
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: BRMS 5.2.0.GA   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRMS-642
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Classes with two fields that used advanced enumeration failed in test scenarios. An overloaded method was created to handle advanced enumerations and prevent test scenarios from failing.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
BRMS 5.1
Last Closed: 2025-02-10 03:14:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
brms.png none

Description Amana 2011-07-19 13:06:07 UTC 
Help Desk Ticket Reference: https://c.na7.visual.force.com/apex/Case_View?id=500A0000007pSZ8&srPos=0&srKp=500&sfdc.override=1
Steps to Reproduce: In BRMS tool:

1) Create a model with two fields, e.g. :

A class called Vehicle, which has 2 fields: "engineType" and "fuelType".


2) Create a enumeration, e.g. :

 'Vehicle.engineType' : ['Petrol', 'Diesel']
 'Vehicle.fuelType[engineType=Petrol]' : ['ULP', 'PULP' ]
 'Vehicle.fuelType[engineType=Diesel]' : ['BIO', 'NORMAL' ] 

3) Try to use it on a Business Rule -> it works

4) Try to use it into a test scenario -> it doesn't work

Note: The engineType field will display the choices into a test scenario but the fuelType won't display them (see the attached file). 
securitylevel_name: Public

The "advanced enums" works on a business rule, however inside a test scenario it doesn't work.
Comment 1 Amana 2011-07-19 13:07:25 UTC 
Attachment: Added: brms.png
Comment 2 Rick Wagner 2011-07-19 18:02:27 UTC 
Help Desk Ticket Reference: Added: https://c.na7.visual.force.com/apex/Case_View?id=500A0000007pSZ8&srPos=0&srKp=500&sfdc.override=1
Comment 3 Rick Wagner 2011-07-19 18:08:00 UTC 
Accidently closed while investigating 'clone'.
Comment 4 Amana 2011-07-19 18:32:11 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue Cloned to BRMS-643
Comment 5 Amana 2011-07-19 18:49:08 UTC 
SourceForge Reference: Added: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1554
Comment 6 Amana 2011-07-19 18:50:18 UTC 
SourceForge Reference: Removed: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1554
Comment 7 Rick Wagner 2011-07-19 18:57:33 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue depends GUVNOR-1554
Comment 8 Geoffrey De Smet 2011-08-23 13:26:45 UTC 
Fixed, see GUVNOR-1554.
Comment 9 lcarlon 2011-08-25 04:50:11 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724802

Classes with two fields that used advanced enumeration failed in test scenarios. An overloaded method was created to handle advanced enumerations and prevent test scenarios from failing.
Comment 10 Jiri Locker 2011-08-31 18:40:55 UTC 
Fix verified in ER3.
Comment 11 lcarlon 2011-09-14 04:27:55 UTC 
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
-https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724802
-
 Classes with two fields that used advanced enumeration failed in test scenarios. An overloaded method was created to handle advanced enumerations and prevent test scenarios from failing.
Comment 17 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-02-10 03:14:03 UTC 
This product has been discontinued or is no longer tracked in Red Hat Bugzilla.