Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/mock/python-mock.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/mock/python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Mock is a Python module that provides a core mock class. It removes the need to create a host of stubs throughout your test suite. After performing an action, you can make assertions about which methods / attributes were used and arguments they were called with. You can also specify return values and set needed attributes in the normal way. koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3222412
[X] Package name - ok. [X] package group - ok. [X] Build successful - ok. [X] rpmlint output: -ok. SRPM: $ rpmlint python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SPEC: $ rpmlint python-mock.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. RPM: $ rpmlint python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [X] Install/Un-install - ok. [X] Package license - They license name mentioned is 'BSD'. The link provided with the source is to 'The Voidspace Open Source License' (which is a BSD variant but please confirm with Fedora legal as mentioned by mether on IRC). In any case it would still be nice to have a copy of the license with the source.
Added license file, I think it's doesn't need to bump up release . Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/mock/python-mock.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/mock/python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3225612
[X] Package name - ok. [X] Package license - ok [X] package group - ok. [X] Build successful - ok. [X] Install/Un-install - ok. [X] rpmlint output: -ok. SRPM: $ rpmlint python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SPEC: $ rpmlint python-mock.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. RPM: $ rpmlint python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Overall - Good
APPROVED
Did anyone try to install this _and_ mock in the same machine? I think we're still clashing (i.e. you will get a conflict on installation), until we fix bug 601725
I've been talking with Zooko of Tahoe-LAFS and Ruben (who is also interested in Tahoe-LAFS) to figure out a way to deal with this until the mock package is updated. Since python-mock is a library needed for testing packages; we could probably get away with packaging the module as a private library for now. Packages which use python-mock in order to build would then be able to set their PYTHONPATH in order to pick up python-mock rather than mock. I can work on adapting this package to do that if you are willing to continue maintaining it.
Clark has updated mock to use the mockbuild module name (see bug 601725 ) so I think it's safe to proceed with this.
ping Praveen Kumar The mock package has moved to a new module name so this is free to go in now. Are you still interested?
Thanks for information, will take a look into it.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-mock Short Description: A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing Owners: kumarpraveen Branches: f15 f16
Git done (by process-git-requests).
python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc16
python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15
python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-mock Short Description: A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing Owners: kumarpraveen Branches: el6
This already exists, please submit a package change request to create a new branch. Thanks!
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-mock New Branches: el6 Owners: kumarpraveen
python-mock-0.7.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.7.2-1.el6
python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc17
python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc16
python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc15
python-mock-0.8.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.el6
python-mock-0.8.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
python-mock-0.8.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-2.fc17
python-mock-0.8.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-2.fc16
python-mock-1.0.1-5.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-1.0.1-5.el7
python-mock-1.0.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please update python-mock version in EPEL7. mockchain does not run on CentOS 7: Traceback ========= [cloud-user@kushal-cent7 SRPMS]$ mockchain Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/mockchain", line 25, in <module> from six.moves import urllib_parse ImportError: cannot import name urllib_parse It seems like this has been fixed in https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/mock.git/commit/?id=af9cbb833e034f6de621475ae56d26effd088321
Sorry, bad post.
(In reply to Ratnadeep Debnath from comment #33) > Sorry, bad post. I am going to clear needinfo request, let me know if you have some other query,