In the previous net-snmp update, implementation of the UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskTable table was rewritten and reporting of the UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode column was accidentally removed from the snmpd daemon. With this update, the object identifier for UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode has been restored and it now properly reports percentages of used inodes on storage devices, thus fixing this bug.
DescriptionMario Heininger
2011-07-25 08:48:12 UTC
Description of problem:
The UCD-SNMP-MIB Table has Fields for DskPercentNode (Used Inodes in Percent), after Upgrade to net-snmp-5.3.2.2-9.el5_5.1 the Field isn't reported any more.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-5.3.2.2-9.el5_5.1
How reproducible:
Install net-snmp from RHEL5.6 Tree , DskPercentNode is reported, update to RHEL5.7 Tree, DskPercentNode list only -1 on all Devices.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEL5.6 NET-SNMP
2. snmpwalk the ucd-snmp-mib
# snmpwalk -v2c -cXXXXXX 127.0.0.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.9 | grep "dskPercentNode"
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.1 = INTEGER: 13
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.2 = INTEGER: 2
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.3 = INTEGER: 27
3. Upgrade to RHEL5.7 NET-SNMP
4. snmpwalk again the ucd-snmp-mib
# snmpwalk -v2c -cXXXXXX 127.0.0.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.9 | grep "dskPercentNode"
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.1 = INTEGER: -1
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.2 = INTEGER: -1
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.3 = INTEGER: -1
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
In the previous net-snmp update, implementation of the UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskTable table was rewritten and reporting of the UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode column was accidentally removed from the snmpd daemon. With this update, the object identifier for UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode has been restored and it now properly reports percentages of used inodes on storage devices, thus fixing this bug.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0165.html