RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 725702 - libvirtd should delete its UNIX domain sockets after remove libvirt package
Summary: libvirtd should delete its UNIX domain sockets after remove libvirt package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libvirt
Version: 6.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Osier Yang
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-26 10:39 UTC by Huang Wenlong
Modified: 2013-10-20 21:44 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libvirt-0.9.4-2.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 11:17:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1513 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE libvirt bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:23:30 UTC

Description Huang Wenlong 2011-07-26 10:39:34 UTC
Description of problem:
This is a Regression bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598163
this bug fixed in rhel6.0  

libvirt socket file still exist after remove libvirt package 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libvirt-0.9.3-8.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
100% 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install libvirt 
#yum install libvirt 
2. start service 
# service libvirtd start

# ll /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
srwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Jul 26 15:19 /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock

3. removre libvirt 
#rpm -e libvirt 
4. check socket file 
# ll /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
srwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Jul 26 15:19 /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
 
it is still there .
  
Actual results:
After remove libvirt package ,the libvirt socket file still exist 

Expected results:
After remove libvirt package ,the libvirt socket file should be deleted 

Additional info:

Comment 3 Osier Yang 2011-08-04 08:58:34 UTC
    daemon: Unlink unix socket paths on shutdown
    
    This patch introduces a internal RPC API "virNetServerClose", which
    is standalone with "virNetServerFree".  it closes all the socket fds,
    and unlinks the unix socket paths, regardless of whether the socket
    is still referenced or not.
    
    This is to address regression bug:
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725702

Patch committed into upstream.

Comment 5 dyuan 2011-08-10 10:59:09 UTC
Reproduced this bug with libvirt-0.9.3-8.el6 and verified PASS with libvirt-0.9.4-2.el6.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 11:17:50 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1513.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.