Bug 725788 – Kernel INFO: possible recursive locking detected

Bug 725788 - Kernel INFO: possible recursive locking detected

Summary:	Kernel INFO: possible recursive locking detected

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 722472

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	unspecified Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2011-07-26 10:54 EDT by Horst H. von Brand
Modified:	2011-07-27 06:38 EDT (History)
CC List:	13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-07-27 06:38:16 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
The messages that show up in /var/log/messages (4.56 KB, text/plain) 2011-07-26 10:54 EDT, Horst H. von Brand	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Horst H. von Brand 2011-07-26 10:54:21 EDT

Created attachment 515299 [details]
The messages that show up in /var/log/messages

Description of problem:
I get the scary messages in the attached file in /var/log/messages

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64

How reproducible:
Dunno, but is seems to show up on each boot

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Attached warning

Expected results:


Additional info:
I had to disable the microcode loading /lib/udev/rules.d/89-microcode,rules completely as this is an old SMP AMD64 (family 15)

Comment 1 Horst H. von Brand 2011-07-26 13:26:38 EDT

I believe this is really in systemd-30-1.fc16.x86_64, sorry for the noise.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2011-07-26 13:39:56 EDT

It isn't.

Comment 3 Harald Hoyer 2011-07-27 06:38:16 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 722472 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.