Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Eval-LineNumbers/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Eval-LineNumbers/perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module adds a line number to hereis text that is going to be eval'ed so that error messages will point back to the right place.
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3241045 $ rpmlint -i -v *perl-Eval-LineNumbers.noarch: I: checking perl-Eval-LineNumbers.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hereis -> herein, here's, here is The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. perl-Eval-LineNumbers.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hereis -> herein, here's, here is The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. perl-Eval-LineNumbers.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval'ed -> evaluated The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. perl-Eval-LineNumbers.noarch: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Eval-LineNumbers/ (timeout 10 seconds) perl-Eval-LineNumbers.src: I: checking perl-Eval-LineNumbers.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hereis -> herein, here's, here is The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. perl-Eval-LineNumbers.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hereis -> herein, here's, here is The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. perl-Eval-LineNumbers.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval'ed -> evaluated The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. perl-Eval-LineNumbers.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Eval-LineNumbers/ (timeout 10 seconds) perl-Eval-LineNumbers.src: I: checking-url http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MU/MUIR/modules/Eval-LineNumbers-0.31.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec: I: checking-url http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MU/MUIR/modules/Eval-LineNumbers-0.31.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. No real issues so far. The spelling error which points to "hereis" is ignoreable. Stay tuned for a full review.
--------------------------------- key: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [X] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2+ The website of this Perl module says "License: unknown". According to the packaging guidelines, such modules should get "GPL+ or Artistic". Why are you using a different license here? [X] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum * 69b20fbf576942a1ef7cffef456b0081 Eval-LineNumbers-0.31.tar.gz 69b20fbf576942a1ef7cffef456b0081 Eval-LineNumbers-0.31.tar.gz.packaged [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - Succesful Koji build available. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache must be updated. [.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled. [.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information, the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), ... [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream... [+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway) [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. I assume the packager has tested it. Don't know how to test it on my system. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ... [.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
(In reply to comment #2) > > [X] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. > Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2+ > The website of this Perl module says "License: unknown". According > to the packaging guidelines, such modules should get "GPL+ or Artistic". > Why are you using a different license here? The pod of the module contains (at the very end of the file): This package may be used and redistributed under the terms of either the Artistic 2.0 or LGPL 2.1 license.
(In reply to comment #3) > The pod of the module contains (at the very end of the file): > > This package may be used and redistributed under the terms of either > the Artistic 2.0 or LGPL 2.1 license. Yes, indeed... I hadn't expected to find a license declaration at that location. Ok, then all seems to be OK, that's why: --------------- PACKAGE APROVED ---------------
(In reply to comment #4) > > PACKAGE APROVED Thanks for the review, Mario. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Eval-LineNumbers Short Description: Add line numbers to hereis blocks that contain perl source code Owners: eseyman Branches: f16 f15 InitialCC: perl-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc16
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.