Hide Forgot
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.5 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020713 Description of problem: The following package in the url is the package. If you go to the jpackage.org site and examine the spec file you will notice they have two packages. ant-optional and ant-optional-full. The ant-optional-full contains the same libraries as ant-optional full, different filenames, but the full has more compiled into it. Since jpackage is providing the same package as ant-optional in there rpm namespace with ant-optional-full they put the provides: ant-optional tag. Make sense. Now you don't want to have them both install at the same time so they put in a Conflicts: ant-optional. When you go to do an install you get the following : [pearcec@mp3 a]$ sudo rpm -Uvh ant-optional-full-1.5-4jpp.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies: ant-optional conflicts with ant-optional-full-1.5-4jpp rpm should smart enough to allow this during the install. Some flag in the code. If the package installing provides and conflicts the same package it should allow it to install. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: The description above should be enough to understan the problem. Additional info:
Yup, that's the way conflicts is supposed to work. Some means other than "smarter rpm" and Conflicts: is needed to package the minimal -> full upgrade path as described. In fact, I suspect that adding Obsoletes: to each package to eliminate the other is closer to the desired behavior.