729521 – spacewalk-common packages requires newer version of selinux-policy-base than what's available

Bug 729521 - spacewalk-common packages requires newer version of selinux-policy-base than what's available

Summary: spacewalk-common packages requires newer version of selinux-policy-base than ...

Keywords:
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias:	None
Product:	Spacewalk
Classification:	Community
Component:	Installation
Sub Component:
Version:	1.5
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Priority:	unspecified
Severity:	medium
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat)
QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List
Docs Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:	space16
TreeView+	depends on / blocked

Reported:	2011-08-10 02:45 UTC by Paul Ehrenreich
Modified:	2011-08-10 09:24 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users
Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-08-10 06:51:23 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)

Description Paul Ehrenreich 2011-08-10 02:45:29 UTC

Description of problem:

installing the spacewalk-oracle package fails due to spacewalk-common-1.5.1-1 requiring selinux-policy-base >= 3.7.19-93. The latest version of selinux-policy-base available for CentOS 6 is selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-54.el6.noarch


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

spacewalk 1.5.1
Centos 6.0 

How reproducible:

every time 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install spacewalk-oracle

  
Actual resulError: Package: spacewalk-common-1.5.1-1.el6.noarch (spacewalk)                                                   
           Requires: selinux-policy-base >= 3.7.19-93                                                             
           Installed: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-54.el6_0.5.noarch (@updates)                                 
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6_0.5                                                            
           Available: selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-54.el6.noarch (base)                                          
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6                                                                
           Available: selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-54.el6_0.3.noarch (updates)                                   
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6_0.3                                                            
           Available: selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-54.el6_0.5.noarch (updates)                                   
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6_0.5                                                            
           Available: selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-54.el6.noarch (base)                                              
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6                                                                
           Available: selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-54.el6_0.3.noarch (updates)                                       
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6_0.3                                                            
           Available: selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-54.el6_0.5.noarch (updates)                                       
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6_0.5                                                            
           Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-54.el6.noarch (base)                                         
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6                                                                
           Available: selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-54.el6_0.3.noarch (updates)                                  
               selinux-policy-base = 3.7.19-54.el6_0.3                                                            
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem                                                     
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest            



Expected results:

installation completed successfully?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2011-08-10 06:51:23 UTC

The newer selinux-policy is essential for correct operation of Spacewalk on RHEL 6. Yes, it's part of RHEL 6.1 release. The fact that CentOS did not release that update is unfortunate but really nothing Spacewalk team would be dedicated on fixing.

You can build the selinux-policy from sources:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2011-July/msg00175.html

Comment 2 Paul Ehrenreich 2011-08-10 09:24:28 UTC

Thanks Jan, I'll give that a shot!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.