RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 730436 - use slapi_rwlock instead of NSPR PR_RWLock directly
Summary: use slapi_rwlock instead of NSPR PR_RWLock directly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ipa
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rob Crittenden
QA Contact: Chandrasekar Kannan
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 730387 730395 743979
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-08-12 22:31 UTC by Dmitri Pal
Modified: 2015-01-04 23:50 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ipa-2.1.1-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Under some rare circumstances certain operations may cause 389-ds to crash or not function properly. Consequence: 389-ds may not be available. Fix: NSPR read/write locks used by 389-ds are not re-entrant. The use of these locks were replaced with POSIX thread read-write locks instead in the IPA 389-ds plugins. Result: 389 should not crash due to re-entrant locks.
Clone Of: 730395
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 18:29:49 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:1533 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: ipa security and bug fix update 2011-12-06 01:23:31 UTC

Description Dmitri Pal 2011-08-12 22:31:37 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #730395 +++

NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant.  389 is refactoring its code to provide and use slapi_rwlocks instead.  All freeipa plugins should be refactored to use the slapi_rwlock interface when it is available.

Comment 2 Dmitri Pal 2011-08-15 14:51:18 UTC
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1635

Comment 5 Rob Crittenden 2011-11-01 13:17:44 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Cause: Under some rare circumstances certain operations may cause 389-ds to crash or not function properly.
Consequence: 389-ds may not be available.
Fix: NSPR read/write locks used by 389-ds are not re-entrant. The use of these locks were replaced with POSIX thread read-write locks instead in the IPA 389-ds plugins.
Result: 389 should not crash due to re-entrant locks.

Comment 6 Namita Soman 2011-11-08 13:08:02 UTC
Looks like this happens "Under some rare circumstances". Please suggest what is the good way to verify this bug

Comment 7 Rob Crittenden 2011-11-08 13:27:22 UTC
This may need to be validated by code review and general acceptance that the server is operating as before.

Comment 8 Michael Gregg 2011-11-08 19:03:45 UTC
verified:SanityOnly

This bug did not seem to pop up in any of our acceptance tests in the past 3 months.

Verified against:
bind-dyndb-ldap-0.2.0-7.el6.x86_64
ipa-server-2.1.3-8.el6.x86_64

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 18:29:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1533.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.