Hide Forgot
Seems xfsprogs-3.1.1-6.el6 also has this problem. Clone for rhel6 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #714934 +++ Description of problem: xfstests 253 will never complete, from the test description: This test was created to verify fixes for problems where metadump would never complete due to an inability to find a suitable obfuscated name to use. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -qa | grep xfsprogs xfsprogs-2.10.2-7.el5 xfsprogs-devel-2.10.2-7.el5 kernel-2.6.18-268.el5 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install xfstests 2. check 253 3. Actual results: Test will never complete Expected results: Test pass Additional info: I think this should be the xfsprogs component, if a kernel fix is needed, please correct me. --- Additional comment from esandeen@redhat.com on 2011-06-21 11:07:05 EDT --- xfsprogs is the correct component, there are upstream metadump fixes which we don't have in rhel5 and this test exercises them explicitly.
Since RHEL 6.2 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as exception or blocker. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This is an expected failure which is fixed upstream, we will need the series starting at 56281ed43abe95e96e45d2287fd0b965b7d4d2b8 xfsprogs: metadump: some names aren't all that special as a backport, to fix it.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No Documentation needed (not customer reported)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0883.html