fonts.alias define -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-200-ksc5601.1987-0 as -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-200-ksx1001.1998-0 but there is no such font in fonts.dir; there is -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-202-ksx1001.1998-0 # proposed alias fix sed -i s,-baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-200-ks,-baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-202-ks,g `find %buildroot/usr/share/fonts -name fonts.alias`
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-9.fc15.src.rpm
It should be fixed in baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc17. I'll prepare updates for F16/15/14 soon.
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc15
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc14
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc16
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.