RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 734896 - multi-entitlement subscribe attempts are NOT getting rejected for non multi-entitlement pools
Summary: multi-entitlement subscribe attempts are NOT getting rejected for non multi-e...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 6.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: William Poteat
QA Contact: John Sefler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: rhsm-rhel62
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-08-31 19:20 UTC by John Sefler
Modified: 2011-12-06 17:23 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 17:23:52 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 729070 0 unspecified CLOSED adding pools to an activation key should be blocked when specifying a quantity>1 for a non-multi-entitlement pool 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1695 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:23:29 UTC

Description John Sefler 2011-08-31 19:20:10 UTC 
Description of problem:
In the stage environment, my attempts to subscribe with --quatity>1 against a pool whose Multi-Entitlement is No are not getting blocked.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager
subscription-manager-0.96.7-1.el6.x86_64
I SUSPECT THIS IS A CANDLEPIN BUG, BUT I DON"T KNOW WHAT VERSION IS DEPLOYED IN STAGE.


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
[root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# grep hostname /etc/rhsm/rhsm.conf
# Server hostname:
hostname=subscription.rhn.stage.redhat.com
proxy_hostname=


[root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# subscription-manager register --user stage_test_12
Password: 
The system has been registered with id: 2a4c55fc-cb78-42f6-a31a-e8836d198075 
[root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# subscription-manager list --avail
+-------------------------------------------+
    Available Subscriptions
+-------------------------------------------+


ProductName:       	Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server, Premium (8 sockets) (Up to
                        4 guests)
ProductId:         	RH0103708                
PoolId:            	8a99f981308acf4201308b9ad4a41d37
Quantity:          	91                       
Multi-Entitlement: 	No                       
Expires:           	06/08/2012               
MachineType:       	physical                 


ProductName:       	Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server, Premium (8 sockets) (Up to
                        4 guests)
ProductId:         	RH0103708                
PoolId:            	8a99f981308acf4201308b9ad7101d3a
Quantity:          	400                      
Multi-Entitlement: 	No                       
Expires:           	06/08/2012               
MachineType:       	virtual                  


ProductName:       	Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Platform, Standard L3
                        (unlimited sockets)
ProductId:         	MCT1035                  
PoolId:            	8a99f981308acf4201309911639a0c51
Quantity:          	96                       
Multi-Entitlement: 	No                       
Expires:           	06/15/2012               
MachineType:       	physical                 


ProductName:       	Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Platform, Standard L3
                        (unlimited sockets)
ProductId:         	MCT1035                  
PoolId:            	8a99f981308acf420130991163ac0c56
Quantity:          	unlimited                
Multi-Entitlement: 	No                       
Expires:           	06/15/2012               
MachineType:       	virtual                  

[root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# subscription-manager subscribe --pool=8a99f981308acf420130991163ac0c56 --quantity=10
Successfully subscribed the system to Pool 8a99f981308acf420130991163ac0c56

^^^ I EXPECTED THAT RESULT TO BE BLOCKED WITH:
Multi-entitlement not supported for pool with id '8a99f981308acf420130991163ac0c56'.

[root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# subscription-manager subscribe --pool=8a99f981308acf4201308b9ad7101d3a --quantity=10
Successfully subscribed the system to Pool 8a99f981308acf4201308b9ad7101d3a


^^^ I EXPECTED THAT RESULT TO BE BLOCKED WITH:
Multi-entitlement not supported for pool with id '8a99f981308acf4201308b9ad7101d3a'.
Comment 1 John Sefler 2011-08-31 19:23:36 UTC 
Note: I can NOT reproduce this bug against my local onpremises candlepin deployed with TESTDATA=1.  This same test passes against my onpremises environment.
Comment 2 William Poteat 2011-09-09 15:10:28 UTC 
Corrected here

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729070

In versions >= candlepin-0.4.11-1
Comment 4 Shwetha Kallesh 2011-09-14 06:49:59 UTC 
Moving the bug to verified..

RPM used:

rpm -q subscription-manager
subscription-manager-0.96.9-1.git.10.adab5e3.el6.x86_64

Steps to reproduce the same:

subscription-manager subscribe --pool=ff8080813255d44a013255d53aca0719 --quantity=10
Multi-entitlement not supported for pool with id 'ff8080813255d44a013255d53aca0719'.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:23:52 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.