Shouldn't this obsolete kdeedu-math < 4.7.0-10 instead of conflicting with it..?

Also, I'm wondering why KDE has two plotting programs; this one and bug #735132...

We'll continue to have kdeedu (and friends) metapackages for upgrade path,
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeedu/kdeedu.spec

(similar to how we've handled split packaging in kdeutils, kdemultimedia, kdesdk, kdegraphics)

Name: ok
License: ok
Source: ok
BRs/Reqs: ok
Macros used consistently: ok
ldconfig: NA
Desktop file validations: ok 
Locales: ok
Docs: ok
Devel: NA
Files: ok
Build: ok
rpmlint: no need to fix
kmplot.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/kde4/kmplot.desktop

No issues found, setting fedora-review+.

Radek: you should check

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

as well.

I see that the upgrade path is sane due to the kdeedu metapackage, but this procedure goes against the current packaging guidelines.

Furthermore, IIRC metapackages aren't allowed in Fedora. Or are kdeedu and friends going away soon?


You could kill kdeedu and the other packages straight away, were you just to add

Obsoletes: kdeedu-math < foover-foorel
Provides: kdeedu-math = fooveer-foorel

in every package that used to be in kdeedu-math.

Using a metapacakge here is the most sane thing to do, imo.  Anything else is prone to errors.

Oh, and kdeedu metapackage may or may not end up being temporary (for a release or 2, the kde-sig hasn't made any final decisions... yet)

Thanks!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: kig
Short Description: Interactive Geometry
Owners: than jreznik ltinkl rnovacek rdieter kkofler
Branches: f16

Eek, make that:

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: kmplot
Short Description: Mathematical Function Plotter
Owners: than jreznik ltinkl rnovacek rdieter kkofler
Branches: f16

Git done (by process-git-requests).

import