Hide Forgot
Description of problem: more info is at https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cluster-commits/2011-March/001843.html I don't see AVCs as a result of this move now, but they could appear in the future depending on what actions will be performed on that file. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch selinux-policy-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch Actual results: # matchpathcon /var/lib/cluster/fence_scsi.key /var/lib/cluster/fence_scsi.key system_u:object_r:cluster_var_lib_t:s0 # matchpathcon /var/run/cluster/fence_scsi.key /var/run/cluster/fence_scsi.key system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 #
Who needs to access to this file?
(In reply to comment #2) > Who needs to access to this file? The fence_scsi agent (/usr/sbin/fence_scsi) and potentially the fence_scsi_check watchdog script.
Ryan, does it cause an issue? Does it work with SELinux in enforing mode?
(In reply to comment #5) > Ryan, > does it cause an issue? Does it work with SELinux in enforing mode? I have not seen any issues, but QE needs to give the official answer here.
I encountered no issues when testing on RHEL6.2. Note that the files created in /var/run/cluster/ by fence_scsi get the following context in my test: # ls -Z /var/run/cluster/ -rw-r--r--. root root unconfined_u:object_r:fenced_var_run_t:s0 fence_scsi.dev -rw-r--r--. root root unconfined_u:object_r:fenced_var_run_t:s0 fence_scsi.key That does not match what is reported in comment #1.
Yes, this is ok. But I need to add labeling for it. I didn't realize we have a transition rule for /var/run/cluster directory. But the /var/run/cluster/fence directory would be nice.
Fixed in selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-114.el6
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html