Bug 742027 - Certificate status does not account for rhn classic
Summary: Certificate status does not account for rhn classic
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 6.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: John Sefler
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: rhsm-rhel62
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-09-28 20:00 UTC by J.C. Molet
Modified: 2011-12-06 17:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 17:25:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Despite the red installed product certs, the overall Certificate Status is GREEN when registered to RHN Classic. (63.67 KB, image/png)
2011-10-01 04:11 UTC, John Sefler
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1695 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:23:29 UTC

Description J.C. Molet 2011-09-28 20:00:41 UTC
Description of problem:
It seems that bug 667991 was only partially fixed.  When you are registered to rhn classic your Certificate status icon in the upper left corner of subscription-manager-gui is still RED, and the system fact 'system.entitlements_valid' is False. 

According to bug 667991 subscription manager should think it is fully compliant whenever it is registered to rhn classic.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
subscription-manager-0.96.11-1.git.14.21c378d.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.11-1.git.14.21c378d.el6.x86_64
python-rhsm-0.96.12-1.git.0.4862863.el6.noarch
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.96.11-1.git.14.21c378d.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  register to rhn classic (or touch /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid )
2.  Start subscription-manager-gui
3.  Look at the system facts
  
Actual results:
 - The certificate status icon is RED.
 - fact system.entitlements_valid is False

Expected results:
 - The certificate status icon is GREEN. (and the message next to it references rhn_classic)
 - fact system.entitlements_valid is True

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Duryee 2011-09-30 17:27:47 UTC
RHEL6.2 0fdd5b9 0.96.13+
master f2fc5b6 0.97.2+

Comment 3 John Sefler 2011-10-01 04:11:10 UTC
Created attachment 525856 [details]
Despite the red installed product certs, the overall Certificate Status is GREEN when registered to RHN Classic.

Verifying version...
[root@jsefler-onprem-62server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager 
subscription-manager-0.96.11-1.git.21.0fdd5b9.el6.x86_64


[root@jsefler-onprem-62server ~]# touch /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid
[root@jsefler-onprem-62server ~]# subscription-manager list --installed | grep Status
    Installed Product Status
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed           
Status:             	Not Subscribed    

[root@jsefler-onprem-62server ~]# subscription-manager facts --list | grep valid
system.entitlements_valid: True


VERIFIED...
 - despite all my non-subscribed products installed, my system.entitlements_valid fact is True
 - the attached screenshot shows the overall Certificate Status is GREEN despite the RED installed products.
 - the Certificate Status message in the gui is "This system is registered to RHN Classic"

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:25:12 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.