Bug 742178 - Imagemagick multilib conflict
Summary: Imagemagick multilib conflict
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ImageMagick
Version: 16
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pavel Alexeev
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 785240 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-09-29 10:17 UTC by mksh
Modified: 2012-01-28 23:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-13 12:16:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description mksh 2011-09-29 10:17:35 UTC
Description of problem:
Multilib conflict when installing imagemagick

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.7.0.10-3

How reproducible:
Simply try to install ImageMagick with multilib_policy=all in your yum configuration file

  
Actual results:
 file /usr/share/ImageMagick-6.7.0/configure.xml from install of ImageMagick-6.7.0.10-3.fc16.i686 conflicts with file from package ImageMagick-6.7.0.10-3.fc16.x86_64

Comment 1 Pavel Alexeev 2011-10-13 20:37:30 UTC
And what you suggest in this situation?

And for what you install both versions of ImageMagick at once? It even not lib in main package to link to. So, just ignore one...

Comment 2 Paolo Bonzini 2011-11-07 14:02:33 UTC
There is a dependency ImageMagick -> zbar -> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras.

I also somehow ended up with two copies of zbar (i686 and x86_64) and two copies of ImageMagick.  Luckily removing zbar.i686 was enough to be able to remove ImageMagick.i686.

However, the problem here is that the configure.xml file is per-arch and should be in /usr/lib and /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.7.0.

Comment 3 Pavel Alexeev 2011-11-13 12:16:12 UTC
Thank you for your bugreport and willing make free software better!

Reported upstream: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19819

We close bug now, as it related to upstream developing. But we continue track changes and whatever it will be fixed ve consider make update in Fedora.

Comment 4 Pavel Alexeev 2012-01-28 23:06:00 UTC
*** Bug 785240 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.