From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 Description of problem: I have a drive with a partition, that is not labled. I told diskdruid to not format the drive, but to mount it to /storage. After installation, there is a failure in the boot process, where Red Hat tries to mount the drive with LABEL=/storage to /storage. Since I never labled the partition, the mount fails. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Didn't try Steps to Reproduce: 1. install Red Hat Linux 8.0 on a system with an unlabled partition that you will not touch. 2. set the untouched partition to mount to some mount point. 3. boot Red Hat Linux 8.0. Actual Results: partition will fail to mount, due to not having a label. Expected Results: the drive will be mounted based on it's /dev/ entry. Additional info:
We should be labeling the partition as part of the install process even if its not being formatted -- works here for me. What does '/sbin/tune2fs -L /dev/hdaX' or whatever the partition in question is show?
'/sbin/tune2fs -L /dev/hdaX' returns a useage statement, but e2label /dev/hdb4 returns a blank line, indicating that there is no lable on the partition. I can't say that I agree with labeling my partition, if I ask the installer not to touch the drive. I would fine this quite annoying.
Labelling all partitions is the only real right answer; otherwise, people have problems when they start moving drives around. By saying to mount it, you are saying to touch it at least minimally, just that it shouldn't be reformatted -- filesystems with an existing label will keep their old label. Unfortunately I can't reproduce the problem here, either. Is this reproducible for you?
Closing due to inactivity. If you have any further information to add to this bug, please feel free to reopen it.