RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 748971 - missing SELinux rules cause openswan labeled IPsec to fail
Summary: missing SELinux rules cause openswan labeled IPsec to fail
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-25 18:02 UTC by Joshua Roys
Modified: 2012-06-20 12:28 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 12:28:14 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0780 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:34:59 UTC

Description Joshua Roys 2011-10-25 18:02:58 UTC
Description of problem:
missing allow rules lead to no labeled ipsec for openswan (ipsec_t).  There are equivalent allows for racoon (racoon_t).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7

How reproducible:
setup labeled ipsec in enforcing

Actual results:
no labeled ipsec

Expected results:
labeled ipsec

Additional info:
policy_module(ipsec-local, 1.0.0)
 
require {
        type ifconfig_t;
        type ipsec_t;
}
 
allow ipsec_t self:netlink_selinux_socket { bind create read };
allow ifconfig_t ipsec_t:unix_stream_socket { read write };
selinux_compute_access_vector(ipsec_t)

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2011-10-25 19:23:48 UTC
I would say this is fixed in the latest RHEL6 (I will be able to check it tomorrow). You could try it with the latest release available on

http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6/noarch/

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-10-30 05:48:00 UTC
Since RHEL 6.2 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 9 Milos Malik 2012-04-16 14:06:08 UTC
Hi Joshua,

if you upgrade selinux-policy packages to 3.7.19-145.el6, do you still see the problem ? Packages are available at http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6/noarch/.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 12:28:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0780.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.