Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libkactivities/libkactivities.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libkactivities/libkactivities-6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: API for using and interacting with Activities as a consumer, application adding information to them or as an activity manager. First step and dependency for bringing Plasma Active to fedora. Once imported, will require modifications to kdelibs, kdebase-runtime to omit their copies of libkactivities and activitymanager, respectively.
Name: ok Summary: ok Release: ok Version: ok License: not ok, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ (actual library) and (CC-BY or BSD) for ontology URL: ok Sources: ok (md5sum d69d42e8521c4a7c01991222572c2cab) BRs: ok Requires: ok Conflicts: ok Description: ok Devel subpackage: ok Macros used consistently: ok Ldconfig usage: ok Uses smpflags: ok No docs/license file provided, contact upstream to fix it (actually I promised it, so I should go through all packages and report it, during BDS). Files: ok So in -devel: ok rpmlint libkactivities-6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3480646 ok Please fix the license issue, otherwise package is ok.
I'm not sure I agree with any license that's not marked GPLv2+ here. Sure, there are some sources that are LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, but the aggregate license of those combined sources for both the library and activitymanager pieces ends up being GPLv2+ The ontologies are fun too, only used during the build process (via onto2vocabularyclass too) to generate some sources/headers, but each of those generated files are clearly marked LGPLv2+
(In reply to comment #2) > I'm not sure I agree with any license that's not marked GPLv2+ here. Sure, > there are some sources that are LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, but the aggregate license of > those combined sources for both the library and activitymanager pieces ends up > being GPLv2+ What I remember we agreed on not using aggregated licenses, didn't we? It's just reminder, if we do not want to follow it, then it's ok for me to approve this. one. > The ontologies are fun too, only used during the build process (via > onto2vocabularyclass too) to generate some sources/headers, but each of those > generated files are clearly marked LGPLv2+ Ok, makes sense.
Meh, we can sort out the licensing details later... :) %changelog * Fri Nov 04 2011 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 6.1 -2 - License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libkactivities/libkactivities.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libkactivities/libkactivities-6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
Ok, thanks Rex. APPROVED
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: libkactivities Short Description: API for using and interacting with Activities Owners: than jreznik kkolfer ltinkl rdieter rnovacek Branches: f16 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests). Dropped kkolfer, not a valid FAS account.
Sorry for the typo. Imported.