RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 749117 - extN: new file created even if open(2) returned -EPERM
Summary: extN: new file created even if open(2) returned -EPERM
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Eric Sandeen
QA Contact: Petr Beňas
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 756309 767187
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-26 08:43 UTC by Eryu Guan
Modified: 2015-01-04 23:01 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.32-229.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 756309 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 08:00:14 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0862 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 kernel security, bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-20 12:55:00 UTC

Description Eryu Guan 2011-10-26 08:43:19 UTC
Description of problem:
In an append only dir, a open(2) call without O_RDONLY and O_APPEND will return -EPERM, but after the call new file is created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.32-211.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. mkdir /mnt/ext4/append-only
2. chattr +a /mnt/ext4/append-only
3. ./test /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile (touch /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile will also work, but touch won't return error, you have to strace touch and search for open, it returns -EPERM)

# cat test.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <errno.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
        int fd;
        fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666);
        if (fd == -1)
                perror("open failed");
        exit(errno);
}
  
Actual results:
[root@fstest xfstests]# mkdir -p /mnt/ext4/append-only
[root@fstest xfstests]# chattr +a /mnt/ext4/append-only
[root@fstest xfstests]# lsattr /mnt/ext4/
--------------- /mnt/ext4/lost+found
-----a-------e- /mnt/ext4/append-only
[root@fstest xfstests]# ./test /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile
open failed: Operation not permitted
[root@fstest xfstests]# ls -l /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Oct 26 16:07 /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile
[root@fstest xfstests]# lsattr /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile
-----a-------e- /mnt/ext4/append-only/testfile

Expected results:
open(2) return success or new file is not created at all

Additional info:
xfs will create new file with no problem
btrfs will fail too

Not sure if it's really a bug, but some kind of inconsistent

Comment 3 Ric Wheeler 2011-10-28 05:31:35 UTC
This would be an upstream discussion I think.

Comment 4 Eryu Guan 2011-10-30 01:33:19 UTC
Seems upstream prefers masking out append and immutable bits from EXTN_FL_INHERITED

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/27277

Comment 5 Eric Sandeen 2011-12-22 19:33:55 UTC
Upstream now as of commit 1cd9f097

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2011-12-22 19:49:46 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Comment 8 Aristeu Rozanski 2012-02-10 19:33:49 UTC
Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-229.el6

Comment 12 Petr Beňas 2012-02-23 09:41:04 UTC
Reproduced in 2.6.32-221.el6.x86_64 and verified in 2.6.32-229.el6.x86_64.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 08:00:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0862.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.