Spec URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/felix-gogo-runtime/0.10.0/1/felix-gogo-runtime.spec SRPM URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/felix-gogo-runtime/0.10.0/1/felix-gogo-runtime-0.10.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Apache Felix is a community effort to implement the OSGi R4 Service Platform and other interesting OSGi-related technologies under the Apache license. The OSGi specifications originally targeted embedded devices and home services gateways, but they are ideally suited for any project interested in the principles of modularity, component-orientation, and/or service-orientation. OSGi technology combines aspects of these aforementioned principles to define a dynamic service deployment framework that is amenable to remote management.
I'll do this one.
Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [X] Rpmlint output: felix-gogo-runtime.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US modularity -> molecularity The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [X] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1]. [X] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec. [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2]. [!] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [X] Buildroot definition is not present [X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4]. [X] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: ASL 2.0 [X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [X] All independent sub-packages have license of their own [X] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [?] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : MD5SUM upstream package: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5]. [X] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other packages for directories it uses. [X] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [X] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with good reason [X] Permissions on files are set properly. [X] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore) [X] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing) [X] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [X] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [X] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks) [X] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils [X] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils [X] Package uses %global not %define [-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...) [-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building [X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [X] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details) [X] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [X] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap === Maven === [X] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms [-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a comment [-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why it's needed in a comment [X] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [X] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro === Other suggestions === [X] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac) [X] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary [X] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible) [X] Latest version is packaged. [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: === Issues === 1. Did not build on Koji rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3495681 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Filenames
Oh, sure, it couldn't, it's missing felix-gogo-parent, which is currently in review. I'll bump this when felix-gogo-parent is in rawhide.
It's customary to add other reviews you need before this into "Depends On" field to prevent situations like this
Oh, thanks, noted. Here, I repackaged it with respect to some updates having happened in the meantime. Builds fine in Koji now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499364 SPEC URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/felix-gogo-runtime/0.10.0/2/felix-gogo-runtime.spec SRPM URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/felix-gogo-runtime/0.10.0/2/felix-gogo-runtime-0.10.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
The SRPM you have posted does not match the one from the Koji build.
Package Review (http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/felix-gogo-runtime/0.10.0/2/felix-gogo-runtime-0.10.0-2.fc15.src.rpm) ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [X] Rpmlint output: felix-gogo-runtime.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US modularity -> molecularity The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [X] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1]. [X] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec. [X] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2]. [X] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [X] Buildroot definition is not present [X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4]. [X] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: ASL 2.0 [X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [X] All independent sub-packages have license of their own [X] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [X] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package :dcf4657b20dde0883ad30cff1ced19de MD5SUM upstream package:dcf4657b20dde0883ad30cff1ced19de [X] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5]. [X] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other packages for directories it uses. [X] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [X] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with good reason [X] Permissions on files are set properly. [X] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore) [X] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing) [X] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [X] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [X] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks) [X] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils [X] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils [X] Package uses %global not %define [-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...) [-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building [X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [X] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details) [X] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [X] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap === Maven === [X] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms [-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a comment [-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why it's needed in a comment [X] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [X] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro === Other suggestions === [X] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac) [X] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary [X] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible) [X] Latest version is packaged. [X] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: x86_64 ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Filenames
Thanks. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: felix-gogo-runtime Short Description: Community OSGi R4 Service Platform Implementation - Basic Commands Owners: tradej InitialCC: java-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=279097