Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.7.spec SRPM URL: http://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-2.el6.src.rpm This is a compat package that can be installed in parallel with the RHEL python-sqlalchemy-0.5.5 package. It's needed initially by openstack. This will only be requested for the el6 branch.
Hi, Build fails with mock... A mock of CentOS6 (OS, Updates & CS) +EPEL. repositories + /usr/bin/python ./sqla_nose.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sqla_nose.py", line 19, in <module> nose.main(addplugins=[NoseSQLAlchemy()]) TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'addplugins' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ya2ziP (%check) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ya2ziP (%check) Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-sqlalchemy0.7.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 328, in do raise mockbuild.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-sqlalchemy0.7.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED Checking now in koji in case it's a RHEL vs CentOS: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3524833 same result. Also if it were me I would remove all the stuff that is never going to be used, i.e. %if ! (0%{?fedora} > 12 || 0%{?rhel} > 5) %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} %endif %if 0%{?fedora} > 12 || 0%{?rhel} > 6 %global with_python3 1 %endif and all the cases below that that use these, they are redundant. Also there is no README.Fedora file suggesting how this package should be used as is dictated in the alternate egg guidelines. Steve.
It will probably work with this: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-nose1.1-1.1.2-2.el6.noarch.rpm That package has been submitted for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755139 I'll add a README.Fedora
Added README.Fedora and built with python-nose1.1 Spec URL: http://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.7.spec SRPM URL: http://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-3.el6.src.rpm
I'll review this as soon as bug #755139 at least becomes a bhodi submission. Steve.
The https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-nose1.1-1.1.2-4.el6 dependency is now submitted
Builds in mock okay. mock -r epel-6-x86_64 --init mock -r epel-6-x86_64 --install python-nose1.1-1.1.2-4.el6.noarch.rpm mock -r epel-6-x86_64 --no-clean --rebuild python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-3.el6.src.rpm +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-sqlalchemy0.7.spec Clean other than python-sqlalchemy0.7.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.7.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/zxjdbc.py this is easy to remove fix with an chmod so should go. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. MIT [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Clearly MIT with good headers. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 0280527f7a80775a770cb3e4bdadaf6f SQLAlchemy-0.7.3.tar.gz 0280527f7a80775a770cb3e4bdadaf6f ../SOURCES/SQLAlchemy-0.7.3.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Not needed. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Not needed [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Comments: So just the shebangs on python libs. The python3 package must be renamed to have a 1.1 on the end, i.e
Thanks Steve! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-sqlalchemy0.7 Short Description: Modular and flexible ORM library for python Owners: pbrady stevetraylen Branches: el6 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-4.el6
Package python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-4.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-4.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-5121/python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-4.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-sqlalchemy0.7 New Branches: devel Owners: pbrady stevetraylen InitialCC: apevec We need to revive this compat package in F19 where python-sqlalchemy was updated to 0.8.0 beta http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=363832 which isn't compatible with OpenStack: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/tools/pip-requires SQLAlchemy>=0.7.3,<0.8
I didn't need to change Status for SCM request.
It's orphaned, not retired, you can pick it up in pkgdb.
(In reply to comment #15) > It's orphaned, not retired, you can pick it up in pkgdb. Didn't see anything in pkgdb webui, tried from cli: $ pkgdb-cli --user apevec unorphan python-sqlalchemy0.7 devel apevec is not allowed to change ownership of this package What's the procedure to unorphan it?
Log into the web ui, and click Take Ownership.